Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] killall should kill scripts too.

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:07 PM, enh wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Rob Landley wrote: >> On 12/17/2017 11:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote: >>> Sigh. You argument that "we can't just do something easily explained but >>> must copy ubuntu's magic edge cases

Re: [Toybox] Out of tree build support

On 19/12/17 10:41, Rob Landley wrote: On 12/18/2017 03:57 PM, Patrick Oppenlander wrote: Hi Rob, are you open to accepting patches for building out of tree? I am working on a project where Toybox will be part of an automated build system, and this would make life a lot easier. Patrick It's

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] killall should kill scripts too.

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > On 12/17/2017 11:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote: >> Sigh. You argument that "we can't just do something easily explained but >> must copy ubuntu's magic edge cases exactly" implies I need to >> understand ubuntu's magic edge cases,

Re: [Toybox] Out of tree build support

On 12/18/2017 05:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > (Probably configure should have VALUE?="blah" and then a shell wrapper > that parses and sets that syntax.) Except when I sat down to try to implement that (again) I hit the problem that configure variable defautls reference other config variables

Re: [Toybox] Out of tree build support

On 12/18/2017 03:57 PM, Patrick Oppenlander wrote: > Hi Rob, > > are you open to accepting patches for building out of tree? > > I am working on a project where Toybox will be part of an automated > build system, and this would make life a lot easier. > > Patrick It's one of my todo list