Re: [Toybox] Android sitrep

2019-10-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/16/19 10:47 AM, enh wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:56 PM Rob Landley wrote: >> I could just do that. (This is _supposed_ to be iobound, what are they doing >> that -P 8 helps? Invoking perl. Oh JOY. More perl to remove from the kernel >> build! And the -n1 means THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] Pass cflags and hostcc in mkroot.

2019-10-16 Thread Denys Nykula
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:10:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > Static linking against glibc tends to break stuff (like DNS lookup) and > produce > TONS of warnings. Noticed. That's unfortunate. > I had a linux from scratch based one of these, which I need to reproduce. But >

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] vi: changes to buffer drawing

2019-10-16 Thread Rob Landley
n 9/19/19 2:52 PM, Jarno Mäkipää wrote: > Actually I think that current crunch_str prints trailing zero width > combining chars just fine? > > since when width==columns its still >= 0 > > . > for (end = start = *str; *end; columns += col, end +=

Re: [Toybox] How can I contribute

2019-10-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/14/19 3:07 PM, Denys Nykula wrote: >> saw one of the Toybox talks and wanted to see how I could contribute > > Completing landley.net/toybox/cleanup.html on toys/pending/{dhcp,route}.c > to help them out of pending would be most demanded I think. That's kind of a high bar, though. :)

Re: [Toybox] Android sitrep

2019-10-16 Thread enh via Toybox
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:56 PM Rob Landley wrote: > > On 10/10/19 8:52 PM, enh wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 11:38 AM Rob Landley wrote: > >> Where is this packaging done in AOSP? (I can dig my way to it eventually, > >> but > >> you'd probably know off the top of your head. :) > > > >

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] Pass cflags and hostcc in mkroot.

2019-10-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/14/19 7:44 PM, Denys Nykula wrote: >> Specifying HOSTCC="/path/to/thingy --options" on the command line bypasses >> the >> airlock step entirely, so it'll wrap the hostcc it finds but then use >> something >> else. :) That's ugly but works. > > I meant after reading mkroot more closely I