(I kind of dozed off... so break off some questions / answers to another
mail)
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 6:41 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> On 2/27/21 10:18 AM, Yi-yo Chiang wrote:
> > Do we want toybox cpio/tar to be feature-identical to GNU or Solaris'
> > implementation? (I hope not, cause that feels
(I'll try to keep it short)
My original motivation to send this patch is that my coworker found out
(when he was working with initramfs) that "cpio -u" behaves differently on
toybox compared to the GNU's implementation.
(my original email, in case it was flagged as spam...:
http://lists.landley.ne
On 2/27/21 10:18 AM, Yi-yo Chiang wrote:
> Using different command to create the archive yields different result, I used
> $
> find dir | cpio -o ... to create the archive for testing:
>
> (testing the behavior of GNU cpio)
> $ mkdir a
> $ echo blah > a/bb
> $ find a | cpio -H newc -o >a.cpio
> $
