--- Original Message ---
On Monday, October 16th, 2023 at 04:21, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/14/23 17:15, Oliver Webb via Toybox wrote:
>
> > I have added the 'v' command (Which is essentially the opposite of the
> > g[lobal] command).
> > Fixed a memory leak in the g[lobal] command (Fr
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, October 16th, 2023 at 05:14, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/15/23 23:23, Oliver Webb via Toybox wrote:
>
> > Hey, I was looking through the command list and discovered a "count"
> > command.
>
>
> I wrote my first one of those in 1998 and couldn't figu
In the blog, Rob said
> I MOSTLY don't care because I don't know of a use case that big (he
> didn't send the test data, nor say how he created it)
I did say
> I can post here about how I tested, if you're interested.
No one said they were interested, so this will probably be my last attempt
to c
On 10/15/23 23:23, Oliver Webb via Toybox wrote:
> Hey, I was looking through the command list and discovered a "count" command.
I wrote my first one of those in 1998 and couldn't figure out why it wasn't part
of the standard unix command set. I posted it all over the place (linux-kernel,
etc) and
On 10/14/23 17:15, Oliver Webb via Toybox wrote:
> I have added the 'v' command (Which is essentially the opposite of the
> g[lobal] command).
> Fixed a memory leak in the g[lobal] command (Freeing data while aborting)
> Along with some code formatting (Replacing *(cmd+1) with cmd[1])
I removed t
