On 10/23/23 18:13, Ray Gardner wrote:
> Rob, thanks for the info, I learned some stuff about pipes from it.
>
> I also looked up setvbuf(), and the standard says it may not be used after
> a previous successful call to setvbuf(). That makes my tests below kinda
> moot.
>
> But still, using _IOLBF
On 10/20/23 01:05, Rob Landley wrote:
>> (though i will accept the argument that "that's a toybox xargs test
>> bug", but (a) we'll still need to fix that test
>
> Any idea off the top of your head which of the 31 tests it was? (I can use the
> git commit time to go dig back through the web archiv
