(to be clear: if you want the arm32 attribute decoding too, i'm happy
to write that. just be aware that it's going to be a big switch rather
than the regular "odd or even?" for riscv, and there are quite a lot
of arm32 attributes:
https://llvm.org/doxygen/ARMAttributeParser_8cpp_source.html)
On
arc, arm32, and csky all have these sections too, but I've never seen
arc or csky in real life, and arm32 isn't as regular as riscv's "odd vs
even" decoding, so we should probably wait until someone actually needs
to decode those before adding the decoder?
---
toys/other/readelf.c | 88
On 11/2/23 18:00, Ray Gardner wrote:
> Rob, feel free to post your reply on the list or your blog or wherever.
>
> As to the hash code, the only part I've taken from Python's
> implementation is the probe sequence
So... NOT the "linked lists descending from each hash bucket" approach then.
>
Got permission to forward it to the list...
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: tsort regrets
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 13:47:05 -0500
From: Rob Landley
To: Ray Gardner
On 11/1/23 10:57, Ray Gardner wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I hope you are feeling better today.
Better is a relative term.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 6:58 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> Blah, forgot to click "send" and let the window get buried...
>
> On 10/28/23 12:18, enh wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 12:29 AM Rob Landley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/25/23 19:48, enh via Toybox wrote:
> >> > Rather than take up yet another
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 7:22 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 11/2/23 16:56, enh via Toybox wrote:
> > This frees up 'x' for xmodem transfers later.
>
> Q to quit makes sense, adding xmodem... do you have an xmodem protocol
> extension
> in mind that doesn't pad the last packet up to 128 bytes?
that
On 11/3/23 09:27, Rob Landley wrote:
>> and make it clear what new options
>> should look like).
>
> I'd rather not apply the patch as is because of the above commit comment
> grumbles, but don't object to code change itself. Should I switch the -64 to
> &31
> while I'm there?
Because the
On 11/2/23 16:56, enh via Toybox wrote:
> This frees up 'x' for xmodem transfers later.
Q to quit makes sense, adding xmodem... do you have an xmodem protocol extension
in mind that doesn't pad the last packet up to 128 bytes? What xmodem command
are you going to run at the other end to consume
Blah, forgot to click "send" and let the window get buried...
On 10/28/23 12:18, enh wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 12:29 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>> On 10/25/23 19:48, enh via Toybox wrote:
>> > Rather than take up yet another key for the new functionality, I've moved
>> > everything to a
Also fix finding the flags in the ELF header for riscv32; the existing
code only worked for 64-bit ELF files.
---
lib/elf.c | 7 +--
tests/file.test | 2 +-
toys/posix/file.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From c7a4bcbe819b8d3e50d42bd2bc3ff80259713586 Mon
On 11/1/23 18:45, enh wrote:
> do you want a patch with the arm32 flags too?
Yes please. I applied your patch and then moved stuff to elf.c and tidied it a
little. Could you confirm the riscv flags still print right with the new trick?
I haven't got a test binary here. (I should break down and
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 12:06 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 11/1/23 18:45, enh wrote:
> > do you want a patch with the arm32 flags too?
>
> Yes please.
(sent.)
> I applied your patch and then moved stuff to elf.c and tidied it a
> little. Could you confirm the riscv flags still print right with
This frees up 'x' for xmodem transfers later.
Also, if we're going to have a single line of help, switch to the more
common format for such prompts (and, if nothing else, fix the previously
inconsistent spacing between options and make it clear what new options
should look like).
---
13 matches
Mail list logo