Re: [Toybox] id vs whoami opinions sought

2015-11-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-11-27 3:19 GMT+01:00 scsijon : > I was just wondering which is better for response and clean output format > in a script since toybox has both available. > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-5.1/man1/whoami.1?query=whoami&sec=1&manpath=OpenBSD-5%2e1 > > thanks > scsijon >

Re: [Toybox] perf(1)

2015-03-11 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
Hi Elliott, 2015-03-12 7:09 GMT+01:00 enh : > oh, i had a suggestion for the roadmap... perf(1). there are two or > three problems with perf, all of which are the kind of problems that > people on this list are likely to be interested in: > > 1. perf itself is GPL. > 2. perf uses elfutils (libelf)

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-28 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-28 4:51 GMT+01:00 Rob Landley : > > (Did I mention computer history is a hobby of mine?) > >> Rich > > Rob > Rob, you're famous :) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8958591 Daniel ___ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-27 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-27 20:08 GMT+01:00 Rich Felker : > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:52:37PM -0500, stephen Turner wrote: >> > >> does musl support bsd makes? > > No, because I'm not aware of any way to do the type of generic rules > we use that would be portable to BSD make. musl is written for Linux and as lo

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-27 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-27 19:11 GMT+01:00 Rob Landley : > On 01/27/2015 01:16 AM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: >> 2015-01-27 7:20 GMT+01:00 Rob Landley : >>> On 01/26/15 12:56, stephen Turner wrote: >> What is important is how this code (without BSD Makefile) may be >> useful for

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-27 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-27 8:27 GMT+01:00 stephen Turner : > I wonder how much of a pain it would be to set it up for gnu make? no pain - just to 15-30 minutes of work. Support for GNU make can be added without touching the (BSD) Makefile (gnu make first execute GNUMakefile): http://www.gnu.org/software/make/ma

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-27 7:20 GMT+01:00 Rob Landley : > On 01/26/15 12:56, stephen Turner wrote: >> yea, if it works well as a drop in replacement for binutils then i think >> it will be a perfect fit with my musl-toybox-pcc-flex-byacc-bsd_m4 setup >> i have going. > > If I can get pcc, musl, and this to build t

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-26 20:38 GMT+01:00 Rich Felker : > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 08:31:08PM +0100, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: >> 2015-01-26 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rich Felker : > In particular, one thing I wonder about is whether it requires O(n) > temporary working space in the number of input symbols

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-26 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rich Felker : > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:34:27PM +0100, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: >> 2015-01-26 18:13 GMT+01:00 stephen Turner : >> > thanks for the response man! I found this and pointed it out in another >> > email chain actually! I haven&#x

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-26 19:56 GMT+01:00 stephen Turner : > yea, if it works well as a drop in replacement for binutils it works, but you will need to add custom sys/cdef.h with musl. btw. ld is not ready. ___ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2015-01-26 18:13 GMT+01:00 stephen Turner : > thanks for the response man! I found this and pointed it out in another > email chain actually! I haven't had a chance to test it and see how it > compares to binutils but i definitely plan to very soon and will report back > how it works. unfortunatel

Re: [Toybox] Is binutils neccessary?

2015-01-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
http://sourceforge.net/p/elftoolchain/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/ Maybe it will be helpful. Daniel ___ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net

Re: [Toybox] make

2015-01-23 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
Proposals such as awk, tcl or python does not make sense, if you still need the GNU make, to compile the kernel, musl etc. + tcl/python as deps... Let us define the problem: we do not want GNU make ('allergic to its license'). Requirements: the ability to compile the _linux_ kernel, musl etc. In

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] optional fatter cat(1)

2015-01-04 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2014-12-29 19:00 GMT+01:00 Rich Felker : > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:21:26PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: >> I plan to implement vi over the next year, but it's one of the four >> realy big commands required by posix (sed, awk, sh, vi) and I've been >> debugging sed against real-world data for _weeks

Re: [Toybox] M4 (Re: Is binutils neccessary?)

2014-12-19 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2014-12-19 16:59 GMT+01:00 stephen Turner : > wrote: >> >> sory for ugly Makefile.. m4 ported from OpenBSD (tested with gcc, >> binutils etc.). > > > so there is no ./configure, and any tweaks or options we want need to be > done in the make file manually > > whats the plans on making this an

Re: [Toybox] M4 (Re: Is binutils neccessary?)

2014-12-18 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
sory for ugly Makefile.. m4 ported from OpenBSD (tested with gcc, binutils etc.). Daniel m4.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net

Re: [Toybox] features

2014-06-09 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2014-06-09 14:57 GMT+02:00 Rob Landley : > On 06/08/14 20:16, Isaac Dunham wrote: >> Yes. It's >> http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Alternative_libraries#Crypto >> (and axtls is mentioned there). > wiki: "dropbear replacement for OpenSSH. does not implement ECDSA yet." ??? https://secure.ucc.asn.a

Re: [Toybox] features

2014-06-07 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
btw. http://www.landley.net/notes.html#31-03-2014 ___ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net

Re: [Toybox] features

2014-06-06 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2014-06-06 18:12 GMT+02:00 stephen Turner : > Rob, have you given any thought into adding a embedded ssh like dropbear to > toybox? or like tinyssh :) http://tinyssh.org/index.html Daniel > > thanks > Stephen > > ___ > Toybox mailing list > Toybox@lis

[Toybox] 0.4.7: 404 Not Found

2014-02-09 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
http://www.landley.net/toybox/downloads/toybox/toybox-0.4.7.tar.bz2 The requested URL /toybox/downloads/toybox/toybox-0.4.7.tar.bz2 was not found on this server. Daniel ___ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.c

Re: [Toybox] whoami == logname ?

2014-02-02 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
yup, even more: "logname" == "whoami" == "id -un" == printf("%s\n", getlogin()); http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=whoami&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html best, Daniel 2014-02-02 Isaac Dunham : > I read throught the status/roadmap, trying to get an i

Re: [Toybox] : Add pmap

2013-08-26 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
+if (!(toys.optflags & FLAG_q) && (toys.optflags & FLAG_x)) + xprintf("Address" TAB " Kbytes PSS DirtySwap Mode Mapping\n"); PSS or RSS? :) Daniel ___ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cg