thanks! (and apologies yet again that i never remember your name... i suck
at names!)
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, 13:19 Eric Molitor wrote:
> I can take a look this weekend.
>
> - Eric
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, 8:32 pm enh via Toybox,
> wrote:
>
>> heh, and the revert commit _did_ get a green ci run.
I can take a look this weekend.
- Eric
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, 8:32 pm enh via Toybox,
wrote:
> heh, and the revert commit _did_ get a green ci run. so, yeah, definitely
> bad. but now we need the guy who set up the github ci in the first place to
> hit us with his cluestick... :-) (how is a failu
heh, and the revert commit _did_ get a green ci run. so, yeah, definitely
bad. but now we need the guy who set up the github ci in the first place to
hit us with his cluestick... :-) (how is a failure to parse not a red cross
with a link to logs, just like if it parsed but the _actions_ failed?!
ma
On 7/20/23 09:07, enh wrote:
> at this point, i'm pretty sure that change silently broke it --- i've never
> seen
> a gap without runs over this many changes, or this amount of time.
>
> revert
> https://github.com/landley/toybox/commit/c45e800803364c6e1f343e431f98e19a1bc1148f
> ?
Done.
I won
at this point, i'm pretty sure that change silently broke it --- i've never
seen a gap without runs over this many changes, or this amount of time.
revert
https://github.com/landley/toybox/commit/c45e800803364c6e1f343e431f98e19a1bc1148f
?
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:10 PM enh wrote:
> yeah, i'll
yeah, i'll keep an eye out and let you know if it doesn't start up again...
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:10 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> On 7/11/23 17:15, enh wrote:
> > especially since we suspiciously haven't had any CI run at all since
> that change
> > went in: https://github.com/landley/toybox/com
On 7/11/23 17:15, enh wrote:
> especially since we suspiciously haven't had any CI run at all since that
> change
> went in: https://github.com/landley/toybox/commits/master
> (i'd expected as least an error, but not even a "ran and failed"!)
I hit that problem back when we added the mac tests an
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:20 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> On 7/10/23 18:58, enh via Toybox wrote:
> > Untested (because I don't know how to test such changes without merging
> > them), but seems plausible based on the documentation at
> >
> https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/vari
On 7/11/23 01:21, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 7/10/23 18:58, enh via Toybox wrote:
>> Untested (because I don't know how to test such changes without merging
>> them), but seems plausible based on the documentation at
>> https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables#about-environmen
On 7/10/23 18:58, enh via Toybox wrote:
> Untested (because I don't know how to test such changes without merging
> them), but seems plausible based on the documentation at
> https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables#about-environment-variables
>
> ---
> .github/workflows
Untested (because I don't know how to test such changes without merging
them), but seems plausible based on the documentation at
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables#about-environment-variables
---
.github/workflows/toybox.yml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Fr
11 matches
Mail list logo
