On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 12/10/2017 08:30 PM, James McMechan wrote:
>> Yes, history still has a lot of sharp teeth waiting to bite.
>> Alas, it is not just old buildings, people are still producing stuff
>> with oddball settings.
>> e.g. my controller software is h
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> My first weekend back home in Austin, and GOING to pick something to
> spend some time on, and I guess it's this. :)
>
> On 12/05/2017 11:32 AM, enh wrote:
>> want me to switch to arrays? (and if so, presumably using ARRAY_LEN
>> rather than a
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 12/10/2017 08:30 PM, James McMechan wrote:
>> Yes, history still has a lot of sharp teeth waiting to bite.
>> Alas, it is not just old buildings, people are still producing stuff
>> with oddball settings.
>> e.g. my controller software is h
On 12/10/2017 08:30 PM, James McMechan wrote:
> Yes, history still has a lot of sharp teeth waiting to bite.
> Alas, it is not just old buildings, people are still producing stuff
> with oddball settings.
> e.g. my controller software is hardcoded to 7-o-1.5 make the
> replacement work like the old
It's _really_ hard to figure out which parts of this are quoted and
which parts are replies...
On 12/10/2017 07:29 PM, scsijon wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2017 08:20 AM, toybox-requ...@lists.landley.net wrote:
> One of the reasons I hadn't done stty yet is I'm not sure how much of
> the serial setting
m: Rob Landley
> To: enh
> Cc: toybox@lists.landley.net
> Subject: Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] Use NULL rather than 0 in vargs.
> Message-ID: <295e1992-8a2f-0070-3c2f-6e5fde0be...@landley.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> My first weekend back home in Austin, and
On 12/11/2017 08:20 AM, toybox-requ...@lists.landley.net wrote:
2. Re: [PATCH] Use NULL rather than 0 in vargs. (Rob Landley)
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:28:50 -0600
From: Rob Landley
To: enh
Cc: toybox@lists.landley.net
Subject: Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] Use NULL rather than 0 in
My first weekend back home in Austin, and GOING to pick something to
spend some time on, and I guess it's this. :)
On 12/05/2017 11:32 AM, enh wrote:
> want me to switch to arrays? (and if so, presumably using ARRAY_LEN
> rather than an explicit end element?)
I can do it as part of my cleanup pas
want me to switch to arrays? (and if so, presumably using ARRAY_LEN
rather than an explicit end element?)
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 03:27 PM, enh wrote:
>> Top bits count too!
>
> Sigh. This is why I use arrays rather than varargs for table driven logic.
On 12/04/2017 03:27 PM, enh wrote:
> Top bits count too!
Sigh. This is why I use arrays rather than varargs for table driven logic.
(I do not understand whoever decided that you promote every argument to
32 bits but _not_ 64 bits. Because systems with 1 megabyte of memory
back in the 80's had roo
Top bits count too!
---
toys/pending/stty.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
From 693e1d9f7a3ebcbb791d1209530cd16aac92bbbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elliott Hughes
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:31:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Use NULL rather than 0 in vargs.
To
11 matches
Mail list logo
