--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, October 17th, 2023 at 04:42, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/16/23 22:29, Oliver Webb wrote:
>
> > > I was hoping to get stuff to share code, but I can worry about that in the
> > > eventual cleanup pass.
> >
> > If you are planning on code-sharing the
On 10/16/23 22:29, Oliver Webb wrote:
>> I was hoping to get stuff to share code, but I can worry about that in the
>> eventual cleanup pass.
>
> If you are planning on code-sharing the regex line substitution stuff.
> Then this will probably be my last patch to vi.c for a while
> (Unless there
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, October 16th, 2023 at 04:21, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/14/23 17:15, Oliver Webb via Toybox wrote:
>
> > I have added the 'v' command (Which is essentially the opposite of the
> > g[lobal] command).
> > Fixed a memory leak in the g[lobal] command
On 10/14/23 17:15, Oliver Webb via Toybox wrote:
> I have added the 'v' command (Which is essentially the opposite of the
> g[lobal] command).
> Fixed a memory leak in the g[lobal] command (Freeing data while aborting)
> Along with some code formatting (Replacing *(cmd+1) with cmd[1])
I removed
I have added the 'v' command (Which is essentially the opposite of the g[lobal]
command).
Fixed a memory leak in the g[lobal] command (Freeing data while aborting)
Along with some code formatting (Replacing *(cmd+1) with cmd[1])
I have been trying to get a implementation of the s[ubsitute]
