Re: [Toybox] Maybe a ln addition if possible?

2020-01-24 Thread Rob Landley
On 1/24/20 1:16 AM, scsijon wrote: >>> as time goes on the version of akdjagh changes to akdjagh-1.2.45, >>> it's the same file, just with additions, it's not as if it's being replaced >>> with >>> a completely new file! >> >> Define "changes". Somebody deleted the old 1.2.34 and made a new

Re: [Toybox] Maybe a ln addition if possible?

2020-01-23 Thread scsijon
On 24/01/20 17:55, Rob Landley wrote: On 1/23/20 7:31 PM, scsijon wrote: I know this is not in the Posix 'ln' standard at present, or really a toybox problem, but i'm becoming frustrated with the number of links i'm having to manually recreate when a set of script source files has it's

Re: [Toybox] Maybe a ln addition if possible?

2020-01-23 Thread Rob Landley
On 1/23/20 7:31 PM, scsijon wrote: > I know this is not in the Posix 'ln' standard at present, or really a toybox > problem, but i'm becoming frustrated with the number of links i'm having to > manually recreate when a set of script source files has it's version changed > after being ammended. >

[Toybox] Maybe a ln addition if possible?

2020-01-23 Thread scsijon
I know this is not in the Posix 'ln' standard at present, or really a toybox problem, but i'm becoming frustrated with the number of links i'm having to manually recreate when a set of script source files has it's version changed after being ammended. As an example: source file is