Re: [Toybox] The new gcc 9 bug you pointed out.

2019-05-08 Thread Rob Landley
On 5/8/19 5:12 PM, scsijon wrote: > So we can expect toybox to be fully llvm/clang compatable soon, or is it > already > so now. Fully for a while now. Android's been building it with llvm for years now, and the Android NDK I've been testing with has been llvm for as long as I've had it working.

Re: [Toybox] The new gcc 9 bug you pointed out.

2019-05-08 Thread enh via Toybox
Android has been clang-only for a couple of releases now, so toybox is tested against a fairly current clang roughly every Friday when I sync AOSP... *From:*scsijon *Date:*Wed, May 8, 2019, 15:12 *To:*Rob Landley, toybox > > On 08/05/19 19:00, Rob Landley wrote: > /cut > > Anyway, you said: >

Re: [Toybox] The new gcc 9 bug you pointed out.

2019-05-08 Thread scsijon
On 08/05/19 19:00, Rob Landley wrote: /cut Anyway, you said: Rob, this may also have an effect in toybox, ?maybe? And pulling up https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/626 ... not that I know of? They removed the debugging feature where printf("%s", NULL) would print "(null)"

[Toybox] The new gcc 9 bug you pointed out.

2019-05-08 Thread Rob Landley
Sorry I can't reply to your email, I haven't moved off gmail yet and it's got to the "sometimes unsubscribing me more than once per day" stage of decay. I hadn't cleaned out the spam filter since Sunday so of course it had false positived on another 30 messages from the buildroot list and such