On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 1:55 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 10/23/23 18:13, Ray Gardner wrote:
> > Rob, thanks for the info, I learned some stuff about pipes from it.
> >
> > I also looked up setvbuf(), and the standard says it may not be used after
> > a previous successful call to setvbuf(). That
On 10/23/23 18:13, Ray Gardner wrote:
> Rob, thanks for the info, I learned some stuff about pipes from it.
>
> I also looked up setvbuf(), and the standard says it may not be used after
> a previous successful call to setvbuf(). That makes my tests below kinda
> moot.
>
> But still, using
Rob, thanks for the info, I learned some stuff about pipes from it.
I also looked up setvbuf(), and the standard says it may not be used after
a previous successful call to setvbuf(). That makes my tests below kinda
moot.
But still, using _IOLBF and then _IOFBF seems to work with glibc and musl
On 10/21/23 20:10, Ray Gardner wrote:
> I am working on a little something, and I found that output from my toybuf
> command redirected to a file is exceedingly slow. But if piped to cat, it
> runs about as fast as expected.
Linux pipe buffers consolidate transactions.
$ cat
I am working on a little something, and I found that output from my toybuf
command redirected to a file is exceedingly slow. But if piped to cat, it
runs about as fast as expected. So I messed around with the
TOYFLAG_LINEBUF and with setvbuf() modes.
I put a line at the top of my program so it
