Attached is the patch to fix the test suite. That is 01.patch.
> there's a different top-level runner, but it's basically just an old
> version of your tests (as can be seen from my diff --- that's from
> doing a cp of the power*.txt files from your upstream ToT over the
> toybox ones). my questio
there's a different top-level runner, but it's basically just an old
version of your tests (as can be seen from my diff --- that's from
doing a cp of the power*.txt files from your upstream ToT over the
toybox ones). my question is whether you're happy to dual-license ToT
or just the exact drops fr
The only change to the bc tests since your commit 1ee1c71e9dbc was:
commit 1201a665bfa6295ef9c0fd2b1a6476e0f0f5d0ac
Author: Elliott Hughes
Date: Thu Mar 28 12:11:22 2019 -0700
bc: add a trivial regression test for input from stdin.
A trivial test, but it would have caught the previous
Landley has created his own version of my test suite; I do not know
what he has done.
Gavin Howard
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:42 PM enh wrote:
>
> this breaks the power tests. did you mean to update them to the
> current upstream ones, as in the attached patch? (it's not clear to me
> whether th
this breaks the power tests. did you mean to update them to the
current upstream ones, as in the attached patch? (it's not clear to me
whether the tests in toybox are forked because they're 0BSD in toybox
but not upstream?)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:09 PM Gavin Howard wrote:
>
> I accidentally pu
I accidentally put the error check into the wrong if statement...
Gavin Howard
From 487eff77b970cf940893dd49bdcd8e29d0423df6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gavin Howard
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:07:43 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] bc: fix previous patch
I put the check into the wrong if. That was my ba
