On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:15 PM scsijon wrote:
>
>
> On 09/07/19 20:31, Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/9/19 2:55 AM, scsijon wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/07/19 16:56, Rob Landley wrote:
> >>> On 7/8/19 10:41 PM, scsijon wrote:
> I was wondering if you would consider adding parts of dcfldd
On 09/07/19 20:31, Rob Landley wrote:
On 7/9/19 2:55 AM, scsijon wrote:
On 09/07/19 16:56, Rob Landley wrote:
On 7/8/19 10:41 PM, scsijon wrote:
I was wondering if you would consider adding parts of dcfldd
(https://linuxx.info/dcfldd/, https://linux.die.net/man/1/dcfldd and
http://dcfldd.
On 7/9/19 2:55 AM, scsijon wrote:
>
>
> On 09/07/19 16:56, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 7/8/19 10:41 PM, scsijon wrote:
>>> I was wondering if you would consider adding parts of ddfldd
>>> (https://linuxx.info/dcfldd/, https://linux.die.net/man/1/dcfldd and
>>> http://dcfldd.sourceforge.net/) rathe
On 09/07/19 16:56, Rob Landley wrote:
On 7/8/19 10:41 PM, scsijon wrote:
I was wondering if you would consider adding parts of ddfldd
(https://linuxx.info/dcfldd/, https://linux.die.net/man/1/dcfldd and
http://dcfldd.sourceforge.net/) rather than having just the ordinary dd 'bits'
to your dd
On 7/8/19 10:41 PM, scsijon wrote:
> I was wondering if you would consider adding parts of ddfldd
> (https://linuxx.info/dcfldd/, https://linux.die.net/man/1/dcfldd and
> http://dcfldd.sourceforge.net/) rather than having just the ordinary dd 'bits'
> to your dd implementation if possible?
What sp
I was wondering if you would consider adding parts of ddfldd
(https://linuxx.info/dcfldd/, https://linux.die.net/man/1/dcfldd and
http://dcfldd.sourceforge.net/) rather than having just the ordinary dd
'bits' to your dd implementation if possible? I know it's not new, but
the extra operands "pa
