On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 4:28 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 1/2/24 17:21, enh wrote:
> >> > if you really care, not even icu4c (my usual answer to such
> >> > questions, and something bionic regularly forwards such questions to),
> >> > you want to talk to something like
> >> >
On 1/2/24 17:21, enh wrote:
>> > if you really care, not even icu4c (my usual answer to such
>> > questions, and something bionic regularly forwards such questions to),
>> > you want to talk to something like
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HarfBuzz instead --- this shit gets
>> > weird, fast.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:04 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> Wow, how long has THIS one been buried behind other windows? (Trying to
> finally
> reboot my laptop so I can upgrade stuff...)
>
> On 10/11/23 11:13, enh wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:22 AM Rob Landley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/6/23
Wow, how long has THIS one been buried behind other windows? (Trying to finally
reboot my laptop so I can upgrade stuff...)
On 10/11/23 11:13, enh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:22 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>> On 10/6/23 05:05, Rob Landley wrote:
>> > Apparently the widest unicode characters
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:22 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 10/6/23 05:05, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Apparently the widest unicode characters are:
> >
> > 1. ﷽
> >
> > 2.
> >
> > 3. ∙
> >
> > 4. ⸻
> >
> > 5. ꧅
> >
> > The first 4 of which xfce's terminal does NOT like. And thunderbird fits the
> >
On 10/6/23 05:05, Rob Landley wrote:
> Apparently the widest unicode characters are:
>
> 1. ﷽
>
> 2.
>
> 3. ∙
>
> 4. ⸻
>
> 5. ꧅
>
> The first 4 of which xfce's terminal does NOT like. And thunderbird fits the
> first one in 3 columns while vim's giving it... 9 I think.
And trying to add a
On 10/6/23 03:49, Jarno Mäkipää wrote:
>> > My problem isn't figuring out what the code is doing, my problem is
>> > figuring out
>> > what the proper behavior of "vi" is to the various inputs. Alas, "man vim"
>> > only
>> > describes command line options and then references "vimtutor" (which
On 10/5/23 15:03, enh wrote:
>> Ah. command0 is the number before the command, command1 is the number after
>> the
>> command. If you ":5d" it deletes the 5th line. If you ":d5" it deletes 5
>> lines
>> starting from the current one. Presumably if you ":5d5"... yup, it deletes 5
>> lines
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 11:15 PM enh via Toybox wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:51 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> > On 10/4/23 21:51, Oliver Webb wrote:
> > > --- Original Message ---
> > > On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 18:59, Rob Landley
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 10/4/23 13:51, enh
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:51 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 10/4/23 21:51, Oliver Webb wrote:
> > --- Original Message ---
> > On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 18:59, Rob Landley
> > wrote:
> >> On 10/4/23 13:51, enh via Toybox wrote:
> >>
> >> > (since it looks like there are folks
On 10/4/23 21:51, Oliver Webb wrote:
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 18:59, Rob Landley
> wrote:
>> On 10/4/23 13:51, enh via Toybox wrote:
>>
>> > (since it looks like there are folks actively working on vi atm...)
>> >
>> > looks like 'b' goes to the
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 18:59, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/4/23 13:51, enh via Toybox wrote:
>
> > (since it looks like there are folks actively working on vi atm...)
> >
> > looks like 'b' goes to the end of the previous word, rather than
> >
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:59 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 10/4/23 13:51, enh via Toybox wrote:
> > (since it looks like there are folks actively working on vi atm...)
> >
> > looks like 'b' goes to the _end_ of the _previous_ word, rather than
> > the beginning of the current word?
>
> There's no
On 10/4/23 19:03, Rob Landley wrote:
> And I'm backing slowly away from this Thing That Needs Focus To Clean Up.
> Gotta
> close the open cans of worms first, thanks...
The if/else staircase on TT.vi_mode in vi_main() seems like an obvious potential
place to call ex/normal/insert functions to
On 10/4/23 13:51, enh via Toybox wrote:
> (since it looks like there are folks actively working on vi atm...)
>
> looks like 'b' goes to the _end_ of the _previous_ word, rather than
> the beginning of the current word?
There's no 'b' but there is a "b" (which is weird because all the
(since it looks like there are folks actively working on vi atm...)
looks like 'b' goes to the _end_ of the _previous_ word, rather than
the beginning of the current word?
___
Toybox mailing list
Toybox@lists.landley.net
16 matches
Mail list logo
