On 2/1/19 3:26 PM, enh via Toybox wrote:
> the current bc_lib[] seems like an oddly unreadable/undebuggable way to write
>
> scale=20
> define e(x){
> auto b,s,n,r,d,i,p,f,v
> b=ibase
> ibase=A
> if(x<0){
> n=1
> x=-x
> }
> s=scale
> r=6+s+.44*x
Yeah, I converted it locally to a text file as part
Because C puts a limit on the size of string literals before it
becomes undefined behavior.
You can rest assured that it is correct; I have tested it well.
Gavin Howard
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:27 PM enh via Toybox wrote:
>
> the current bc_lib[] seems like an oddly unreadable/undebuggable way
the current bc_lib[] seems like an oddly unreadable/undebuggable way to write
scale=20
define e(x){
auto b,s,n,r,d,i,p,f,v
b=ibase
ibase=A
if(x<0){
n=1
x=-x
}
s=scale
r=6+s+.44*x
...
___
Toybox mailing list
Toybox@lists.landley.net
http://lists.landley.n
