[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-04-05 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y)
Michael Renzmann wrote: > Personally, I'm not in favour of any bidding-style models. Bounties are > fine, as they allow a group of people to throw their money in a pot if > they are interested in a similar piece of software. That is the theory, but IRL, how does it take place? How the "bounty" is

[Trac] Re: Unsupported repository: trac 0.10 svn 1.4 to trac 0.11 svn 1.5

2009-04-05 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [20090406 02:35], Carlos S (neu...@gmail.com) wrote: >Do you mean python-svn binding? >Sorry, but I am still newbie to this stuff. Could you please elaborate >more on what should I do? Well, yes. On most systems the packages or ports come in a Subversion and Python-Subversion split. The form

[Trac] Re: Unsupported repository: trac 0.10 svn 1.4 to trac 0.11 svn 1.5

2009-04-05 Thread Carlos S
Thanks for the reply Jeroen. Do you mean python-svn binding? Sorry, but I am still newbie to this stuff. Could you please elaborate more on what should I do? Thanks, CS. On Apr 5, 1:10 am, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > -On [20090404 21:14], Carlos S (neu...@gmail.com) wrote: > > >A fr

[Trac] Re: Subversion 1.6 with Trac 0.11.4

2009-04-05 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [20090405 19:28], Paurush (paurush.sax...@gmail.com) wrote: >Thanks everyone for all your valuable comments. I am now seriously >contemplating moving to subversion 1.5.5 (and trac 0.11.4) rather than >jump to 1.6. I hope moving to svn 1.5 is not that risky! Been running that for a

[Trac] Re: Subversion 1.6 with Trac 0.11.4

2009-04-05 Thread Paurush
Thanks everyone for all your valuable comments. I am now seriously contemplating moving to subversion 1.5.5 (and trac 0.11.4) rather than jump to 1.6. I hope moving to svn 1.5 is not that risky! Thanks, Paurush On Apr 3, 4:35 am, Christian Boos wrote: > Paurush wrote: > > Hello All, > > > I am