Hi,
is it possible to group topics, e.g. in the link "TitleIndex" I see:
Trac
* TracAccessibility
* TracAdmin
* TracBackup
* TracBrowser
* ...
or
Wiki
* WikiDeletePage
* WikiFormatting
* WikiHtml
* WikiMacros
So there is a list of all trac (or wiki) topics
> is it possible to group topics, e.g. in the link "TitleIndex" I see:
You can use page hierarchies:
FirstTopic/MyPage
FirstTopic/MyOtherPage
etc.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Users" group
On May 30, 2009, at 1:10 PM, ptrash wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to group topics, e.g. in the link "TitleIndex" I see:
>
> Trac
>* TracAccessibility
>* TracAdmin
>* TracBackup
>* TracBrowser
>* ...
>
> or
> Wiki
>* WikiDeletePage
>* WikiFormatting
>* WikiHt
It works. Thank you.
Roger Oberholtzer-2 wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 30, 2009, at 1:10 PM, ptrash wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it possible to group topics, e.g. in the link "TitleIndex" I see:
>>
>> Trac
>>* TracAccessibility
>>* TracAdmin
>>* TracBackup
>>* TracBrowser
>>*
Roger Oberholtzer writes:
> On May 30, 2009, at 1:10 PM, ptrash wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it possible to group topics, e.g. in the link "TitleIndex" I see:
>>
>> Trac
>>* TracAccessibility
>>* TracAdmin
>>* TracBackup
>>* TracBrowser
>>* ...
>>
>> or
>> Wiki
>>* Wiki
Hello, I just started using trac with svn and it is very nice. I
wanted to implement some build and test automation into it and was
looking for these features:
-checks out code
-builds and checks for errors
-runs a test suite (run the executable with various predetermined
parameters, checks exit
Johnny Chang writes:
> Hello, I just started using trac with svn and it is very nice. I
> wanted to implement some build and test automation into it and was
> looking for these features:
>
> -checks out code
> -builds and checks for errors
> -runs a test suite (run the executable with various p
> Roger Oberholtzer writes:
> > My only request would be that TestProcedureTprofilePP be grouped with
> > the other TestProcedure items instead of the strict alphabetical
> > method used.
>
> That doesn't seem to be supported.
Too bad. I can guess that it is more work. But it would rea