[Trac] Re: Missing attachments after upgrading

2013-11-11 Thread RjOllos
On Monday, November 11, 2013 8:16:13 AM UTC-8, Rainer Sokoll wrote: > Hi, > > recently I moved a trac instance from server A running trac 0.12 to server > B running trac 1.0.1. > For some unknown reason, not all attachments wer copied, but I did not > notice that. > After a user complained, I

Re: [Trac] CamelCase with slashes

2013-11-11 Thread Christian Boos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2013 8:07 AM, Remy Blank wrote: > Peter Suter wrote: >> Looks like it was actually intentional: >>> WikiPageNames now also accept names like Page/Sub (which can be >>> seen >> as a good thing) > > Yes, I saw that. It looks to me like a justif

[Trac] Re: Trac 1.0.1 ticket templates not found

2013-11-11 Thread Sam
No ideas at all? I really could use some help on this! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this gro

Re: [Trac] TRAC 1.0.x compatibility against SVN 1.8.x

2013-11-11 Thread Olemis Lang
Hi ! :) On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Maisie Han wrote: > Just a noob question. Is TRAC 1.0.x compatible against SVN 1.8.x? > Reading this, http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracUpgrade#to1.0, I think it > still is supported, but just not by default right? > > And version 0.12.x will continue to

Re: [Trac] Missing attachments after upgrading

2013-11-11 Thread Rainer Sokoll
Am 11.11.2013 um 18:33 schrieb Olemis Lang : Hi, > It seems the upgrade is partially broken ? ... anyway ... what happens after > copying $TRAC_ENV/attachments/wiki/Arbeitsergebnisse/Vorlage_SRS.zip to the > new location > $TRAC_ENV/files/attachments/wiki/ded/dedda92c1b093886e0456d55cc374d47e

Re: [Trac] Missing attachments after upgrading

2013-11-11 Thread Olemis Lang
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Rainer Sokoll wrote: > Hi, > :) > > recently I moved a trac instance from server A running trac 0.12 to server > B running trac 1.0.1. > For some unknown reason, not all attachments wer copied, but I did not > notice that. > After a user complained, I copied t

[Trac] Missing attachments after upgrading

2013-11-11 Thread Rainer Sokoll
Hi, recently I moved a trac instance from server A running trac 0.12 to server B running trac 1.0.1. For some unknown reason, not all attachments wer copied, but I did not notice that. After a user complained, I copied the missing files into the correct directories. Still, trac throws a 404: 2

Re: [Trac] CamelCase with slashes

2013-11-11 Thread Clemens Feige
Clemens Feige wrote: In my opinion it should be like this: "Germany/Berlin" -> shall be not be linked, From: Peter Suter I'm not so sure it's a good idea to change this back. Trac users since 0.12 have surely intentionally created such pages and links. Hi Peter. Indeed, one has to bal

[Trac] TRAC 1.0.x compatibility against SVN 1.8.x

2013-11-11 Thread Maisie Han
Just a noob question. Is TRAC 1.0.x compatible against SVN 1.8.x? Reading this, http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracUpgrade#to1.0, I think it still is supported, but just not by default right? And version 0.12.x will continue to work against SVN 1.7 but not SVN 1.8? http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/

[Trac] Re: FineGrainedPermissions, FineGrainedPageAuthzEditorPlugin and HtGroupEditorPlugin troubles

2013-11-11 Thread RjOllos
On Sunday, November 10, 2013 4:48:37 AM UTC-8, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: > > Hi, > > I am having troubles configuring FineGrainedPermissions in Trac. I have > tried configuring it manually, using an authzpolicy.conf with he > following content: > > [wiki:*] > [wiki:WikiStart*] > [wiki:WikiSt