[Trac] Re: Revision log Trac link problem/question

2007-03-01 Thread Oliver Paulus
Thank you for your answer. I think I will wait for 0.11 :) >In 0.10, a workaround would be to specify the full URL (instead of a >Trac link), which can already contain the limit parameter. I have tested this on my version - but it does not work to add "&limit=200" to the query string. I have inst

[Trac] Revision log Trac link problem/question

2007-03-01 Thread Oliver Paulus
I am using Trac 0.10. If I use the revision log trac link syntax (e.g): log:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2038 the resulting link does not show all revisions - it shows revision 2038 to 1939. Is there a limitation for the revision log page? Regards Oliver Paulus

[Trac] enhancement 1791 - custom ticket field wiki style

2007-02-16 Thread Oliver Paulus
are very small - I think it would be great to have it in future. Regards Oliver Paulus --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to

[Trac] fast(er) Trac setup on Win32 box?

2006-11-01 Thread Oliver Paulus
- it is very fast but I need NTLM and SSL support for the webserver :( What is about WSGI? Any ideas? Regards -- Oliver Paulus --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to