Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:26 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hi!, > > On jue, 2008-06-26 at 09:47 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > > > > > the desktop/ini file will contain fields for : > > > > directories to watch > > recursive directories to watch > > ignore directories regex > > files to inde

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:26 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hi!, > > On mié, 2008-06-25 at 12:16 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > > > > > > Not quite what I had in mind - the indexer should be dumb and fed stuff > > to index by the daemon. the exception is directories which need to be > > recurs

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 15:17 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: > > > > the desktop/ini file will contain fields for : > > > > directories to watch > > recursive directories to watch > > ignore directories regex > > files to index regex > > files to ignore regex > > index executable > > index module na

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Martyn Russell
Miha Bevk wrote: > I hate this f** message!! Hi, What exactly do you hate about this message? > --- On Thu, 6/26/08, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities > To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hi!, On jue, 2008-06-26 at 09:47 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > the desktop/ini file will contain fields for : > > directories to watch > recursive directories to watch > ignore directories regex > files to index regex > files to ignore regex > index executable > index module name > file mime

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hi!, On mié, 2008-06-25 at 12:16 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > > Not quite what I had in mind - the indexer should be dumb and fed stuff > to index by the daemon. the exception is directories which need to be > recursively scanned (not sure we need separate queues for them) > I did it this

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Martyn Russell
Jamie McCracken wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 19:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: >> Jamie McCracken wrote: >>> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:46 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: Hi all, Thinks are all going well on the indexer-split branch, however, it occurred to me that daemon has its

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 19:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: > Jamie McCracken wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:46 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Thinks are all going well on the indexer-split branch, however, it > >> occurred to me that daemon has its work duplicated in the ind

Re: [Tracker] Tracker daemon/indexer responsibilities

2008-06-26 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 19:22 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: > Jamie McCracken wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:46 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: > >> The Daemon > >> == > >> > >> So, recently in the daemon, I just finished writing the code to crawl > >> the file system and queue ALL files in