well using it raw is not an option as its too different and too inefficient
sqlite fts is not moving very fast (only dfference between FTS2 and FTS3 was
a bug fix tot he index structure) and is fairly stable
I will use ifdef directives to mark our changes so hopefully we can easily
adapt it to F
2008/9/20 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> But before all of this, have you asked the SQLite developers if they
> would be interested in a patch from us to add such functionality? I
> really think forking should be the last step.
>
FWIW, fully agree with what you said.
Speaking with my De
Jamie McCracken wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 05:56 +0300, Ivan Frade wrote:
>> Hi Jamie
Hi
>> This FTS3 sounds great, and could help to remove a lot of "home brew" code.
>>
>>> All the above disadvantages can be sorted by forking FTS 3 and
>>> including:
>> well, "forking" doesn't sound so go
