Re: [Tracker] Releasing Tracker 0.6.90

2009-02-06 Thread Michael Biebl
2009/2/5 Martyn Russell : > Jamie McCracken wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 16:26 +, Martyn Russell wrote: >>> >>> Jamie McCracken wrote: we are not deleting from qdbm! If you have changed stuff to do this then please revert. O.6.6 never deleted from qdbm and indeed never shou

Re: [Tracker] Releasing Tracker 0.6.90

2009-02-06 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:41 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > > we are only deleting from sqlite. Phantom hits are weeded out by > > checking if service ID exists in sqlite. Hit counts for searches are > > estimates only (same as they are for google) > > I still think there should be some cleanup t

Re: [Tracker] Releasing Tracker 0.6.90

2009-02-06 Thread Carlos Garnacho
On jue, 2009-02-05 at 11:09 -0500, Jamie McCracken wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 15:50 +, Martyn Russell wrote: > > Jamie McCracken wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 14:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote: > > >> Jamie McCracken wrote: > > >>> Thanks I will check over weekend and try and fix some

Re: [Tracker] TI crash

2009-02-06 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hi! Just fixed it in trunk, please test to check the crash is gone for you too, thanks for noticing! Cheers, Carlos On vie, 2009-02-06 at 10:27 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > Hi, > > r2885 gives me this crash: > > (tracker-indexer:19123): Tracker-DEBUG: Transaction commit > (tracker-in

[Tracker] TI crash

2009-02-06 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
Hi, r2885 gives me this crash: (tracker-indexer:19123): Tracker-DEBUG: Transaction commit (tracker-indexer:19123): Tracker-DEBUG: Flushing index with 30089 items in cache *** glibc detected *** /usr/libexec/tracker-indexer: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x09401098 *** === Backtrace: