On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 10:10 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 18:32 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:18 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> >>> yeah I dont know why they replaced the fast summarised stats with a real
> >>> time coun
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 10:20 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> It should be said that the current solution of looking into the database
> and trying to deduce what Evolution sees is a really bad idea. This is a
> temporary solution and we are asking for pain if we stick with it.
Agreed
> Evolutio
Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
Hi,
Hi Laurent,
first congratulations for Tracker 0.6.91!
Thanks :)
But I experience many troubles with Evolution 2.24.5 for a long time
(before Tracker 0.6.90): after a moment, Evolution loops forever when it
tries to download mails, or when I delete old mails,
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 18:32 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:18 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
yeah I dont know why they replaced the fast summarised stats with a real
time count which is way too slow
martyn can you revert that bit?
doing a count with
