Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Martyn Russell
Jamie McCracken wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 09:02 +, Martyn Russell wrote: Jamie McCracken wrote: Whilst its not tremendously urgent, the optimal solution AFAICT is to have an in memory stat table Basically calc stats once at startup and then increment/decrement as you index You could re

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Martyn Russell
Jamie McCracken wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 11:26 +0200, Ivan Frade wrote: Hi! On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Martyn Russell wrote: Jamie McCracken wrote: Anyway I think thats better than say calc stats continuously especially

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:57 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote: > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 14:03 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 18:32 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:18 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > > > > yeah I dont know why they replaced the fast summari

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 09:02 +, Martyn Russell wrote: > Jamie McCracken wrote: > > Whilst its not tremendously urgent, the optimal solution AFAICT is to > > have an in memory stat table > > > > Basically calc stats once at startup and then increment/decrement as you > > index > > > > You could

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 14:03 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 18:32 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:18 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote: > > > yeah I dont know why they replaced the fast summarised stats with a real > > > time count which is way too slow > >

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 11:26 +0200, Ivan Frade wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Martyn Russell > wrote: > Jamie McCracken wrote: > > Anyway I think thats better than say calc stats > continuously especially >

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Ivan Frade
Hi! On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Martyn Russell wrote: > Jamie McCracken wrote: > >> >> Anyway I think thats better than say calc stats continuously especially >> as applet requests stats every few seconds if you have the stat window >> open >> > > Eeek, why? > We have a signal which upd

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.6.91 released

2009-03-16 Thread Martyn Russell
Jamie McCracken wrote: Whilst its not tremendously urgent, the optimal solution AFAICT is to have an in memory stat table Basically calc stats once at startup and then increment/decrement as you index You could recalc stats after removing a volume or hold stats by volume which would allow you t