On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:29 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > * Is there already an indexer for Tomboy or GNote[4]? If yes, I think I
> > could reuse it because the XML file format is exactly the same. While
> > searching I only found this message (including some code):
> > http://www.mail-archive.
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:29 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > * Is there already an indexer for Tomboy or GNote[4]? If yes, I think I
> > could reuse it because the XML file format is exactly the same. While
> > searching I only found this message (including some code):
> > http://www.mail-archive
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:15 +0200, Cornelius Hald wrote:
> Hello Everyone!
Hey!
> I'm the author of Conboy[1] a Tomboy[2] compatible note taking
> application for the Maemo[3] platform. As the next version of Maemo will
> feature Tracker, I thought I should add some support for Tracker to my
> ap
Hello Everyone!
I'm the author of Conboy[1] a Tomboy[2] compatible note taking
application for the Maemo[3] platform. As the next version of Maemo will
feature Tracker, I thought I should add some support for Tracker to my
application as well. But before I can do that I still have some
questions:
I generally agree - I dont see any harm in adding config options to
manage the cache as well as dbus methods to manage it
I can see worst case scenarios where lots of different volumes are added
and wastefully indexed which bloat up our database. Having a means to
manage this would be good
jamie
Hi Brandon,
I haven't check the code in the patch, just read the document. Why do we
need to add this logic? I think that the common use cases are covered with
our "limited amount of volumes" cache.
In the case we needed to modify the volumes table size, it could be
implemented also as a simple
