Re: [Tracker] GNOME module proposal?

If shell will make it optional then maybe we will toowe already released along time ago 2009/8/13 Jerry Tan > Are you sure that zeitgeist will go into gnome 2.28? > > it already passed feature freeze timeline. > > > Thanks to my GSoC student ther is a possibility that the zeitgeist engine >> mi

Re: [Tracker] GNOME module proposal?

Are you sure that zeitgeist will go into gnome 2.28? it already passed feature freeze timeline. Thanks to my GSoC student ther is a possibility that the zeitgeist engine might make it into GNOME 2.28 since Shell would like to use it as a main refrence point for recently used and most used etc

Re: [Tracker] GNOME module proposal?

Thanks to my GSoC student ther is a possibility that the zeitgeist engine might make it into GNOME 2.28 since Shell would like to use it as a main refrence point for recently used and most used etc...Thus from 2.28 to 3.0 we would like to change our storage to tracker if possible! 2009/8/13 Jerry

Re: [Tracker] GNOME module proposal?

Zeitgeist is target GNOME 2.30, or 3.0 will tracker target it also? Seif Lotfy : Hey I would like to at least see the storage in there! Would then allow zeitgeist to take it in as a dependency! +1 for me 2009/8/12 Martyn Russell mailto:mar...@lanedo.com>> Hi all, So I was reading s

Re: [Tracker] GNOME module proposal?

Hey I would like to at least see the storage in there! Would then allow zeitgeist to take it in as a dependency!+1 for me 2009/8/12 Martyn Russell > Hi all, > > So I was reading some blogs and noticed that now is the time to propose > GNOME inclusion for Tracker if we want to do it. > > So what

[Tracker] GNOME module proposal?

Hi all, So I was reading some blogs and noticed that now is the time to propose GNOME inclusion for Tracker if we want to do it. So what I want people to think about is: Do we want this? I think we should try to align ourselves with *some* release schedule. Right now we not really aligned to

[Tracker] Announcement of the parser branch

Hackers! We should have done this more early, I agree. Apologizes. We want contributors to help us implement stuff, so we should communicate with them more often. Jürg recently published his changes to a branch called parser so that I could experiment with it. This branch implements a manual SPAR