Tshepang Lekhonkhobe :
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 21:17, Ivan Frade wrote:
Hi Tshepang,
There will be at least one more release. We are fixing the last details.
Anyway, don't expect much more from 0.6.x The fun is now on 0.7 :)
Does TST run on 0.7? Last I checked, few months, there we
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 21:17, Ivan Frade wrote:
> Hi Tshepang,
>
> There will be at least one more release. We are fixing the last details.
>
> Anyway, don't expect much more from 0.6.x The fun is now on 0.7 :)
Does TST run on 0.7? Last I checked, few months, there were no results.
--
my pla
Hi Tshepang,
There will be at least one more release. We are fixing the last details.
Anyway, don't expect much more from 0.6.x The fun is now on 0.7 :)
Regards,
Ivan
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is 0.6 series dead or are there plans to continue ma
Hi,
Is 0.6 series dead or are there plans to continue maintenance and
release 0.6.96?
--
my place on the web:
floss-and-misc.blogspot.com
___
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
Err, I'm of course talking about libtracker-miner, not libtracker-namer...
___
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
currently, we have a branch of tracker named libtracker-namer, which
includes a lib to be shared among all miners (if I got it right).
Currently, this lib includes a miner skeleton, and monitoring
functions. The idea would be to include more fe
El 16/08/09 14:42, Martyn Russell escribió:
> On 16/08/09 09:05, Ivan Frade wrote:
>> Hi Adrien!
>
> Hi all,
Hi all, first of all thanks for the feedback
>
>>> as part of my gsoc project, I implemented a system to allow
>>> Tracker to
>>> index online resources. It's basically split into two parts
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:18 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I was reading some blogs and noticed that now is the time to propose
> GNOME inclusion for Tracker if we want to do it.
>
> So what I want people to think about is: Do we want this?
>
> I think we should try to align ours