Greetings,
Forgive me for being a noob in the area of open source development. I am
not sure how you want submissions of patches. I have attached a patch that
makes the T-S-T version 0.8.3 accept search terms from the command line as
it did in version 0.6.96. This required minor modifications o
Is miner-fs aware about the fact an application creates a new files and
provide for herself to create a new subject in tracker-store?
Which is the correct behaviour for a program when creating a new object
on the filesystem?: insert it in the store and attach interesting
metadata, or wait for miner
Hi Tobias,
> some days ago I installed tracker and up to now nearly everything worked
> as expected. However, I have some issues regarding indexing of odf/odt
> files. It seems that tracker is not indexing any of my odf files at all.
> I am using Arch Linux and tracker v. 0.8.3.
>
> According to
Hey folks,
some days ago I installed tracker and up to now nearly everything worked
as expected. However, I have some issues regarding indexing of odf/odt
files. It seems that tracker is not indexing any of my odf files at all.
I am using Arch Linux and tracker v. 0.8.3.
According to the list of
> >
> > I think it is silly to use 2 different libraries to do the same thing
> > and if one does things better than another...
>
> Its way too slow to use CJK breaking on non-CJK text - really the parser
> checks the language before using the appropriate algorithm. The
> extractor lacks the in
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 09:54 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 25/04/10 21:59, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 22:34 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> >> Hi Jamie,
> >>
> I think it makes sense to fix this. Just to be clear, does this mean we
> don't need Pango in libtrac
Some small comments here.
> >>
> I think it makes sense to fix this. Just to be clear, does this mean we
> don't need Pango in libtracker-fts/tracker-parser.c to determine word
> breaks for CJK?
> >>>
> >>> Thats not broken so would not recommend trying to "fix" that
>
> Well, give
On 25/04/10 21:59, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 22:34 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hi Jamie,
I think it makes sense to fix this. Just to be clear, does this mean we
don't need Pango in libtracker-fts/tracker-parser.c to determine word
breaks for CJK?
Thats not broken so w
