On 01/09/10 20:29, Michael Steiner wrote:
Hi Martyn,
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:58:52 +0100, Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com said:
Thanks for a quick and detailed reply!
No problem,
MR This is in master, but not in 0.8.
I must admit i haven't tried yet master/0.9 as even with a
Hi,
I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and
it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on
each directory recursively, until I made it stop.
Is that normal?
At 11:30 I was fed up and decided to stop it from indexing $HOME and
start index
On 02/09/10 04:41, Michael Steiner wrote:
Following additional observations after having enabled increased
logging and doing some work towards using 0.9. Assuming that the
information below might be too much from the mailing list, in
particular with attached logs, i send it only to you. Tell me
On 02/09/10 10:52, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and
it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on
each directory recursively, until I made it stop.
Which version of Tracker are you using? There
On 02/09/10 10:52, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and
it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on
each directory recursively, until I made it stop.
Which version of Tracker are you using? There
On 09/02/2010 01:16 PM, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 02/09/10 10:52, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and
it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on
each directory recursively, until I made it stop.
On 09/02/2010 02:45 PM, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote:
It is quite possible that my database is corrupted and so tracker thinks
it has to reindex everything.
I just wiped my databased and started indexing from zero, hopefully,
that'll help.
That was of great help, now tracker starts much more quickly.
Hi again :)
Sorry to bother you with my problem but it seems I can't get
tracker-miner-fs to index my mbox files. tracker-info cannot find
anything about the file whereas tracker-miner-fs tells me that the file
should be monitored. And when I manually run tracker-extract on that
file, it print a
What is it?
===
All-in-one indexer, search tool and metadata database.
Where can I find out more?
==
You can visit the project web site:
http://www.tracker-project.org/
Where can I get it?
===
http://download.gnome.org/sources/tracker/0.8/
What is it?
===
All-in-one indexer, search tool and metadata database.
Where can I find out more?
==
You can visit the project web site:
http://www.tracker-project.org/
Where can I get it?
===
http://download.gnome.org/sources/tracker/0.9/
Hello Maryn,
i see that you are very busy in different questions (tracker-list)
I have installed newer versions of tracker on my ubuntu lucid.
But I had no goals with evolution push service. Version 0.9.17 is
difficult to install, because libgtkhtml has an older version on lucid.
For now i have
On 02/09/10 16:41, Matthias Thon wrote:
Hello Maryn,
Hi,
i see that you are very busy in different questions (tracker-list)
I have installed newer versions of tracker on my ubuntu lucid.
But I had no goals with evolution push service. Version 0.9.17 is
difficult to install, because
Martyn,
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:26:44 +0100, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com
said:
MR I see. We do 2 things here. We store the file and its mtime in the
MR database. We also use inotify to monitor changes during the day to day
MR running of the computer. When the miner-fs starts, it
For me, an initial index takes:
Finished mining in seconds:303.820123, total
directories:2224, total
files:19550
For crawling subsequent times takes:
Finished mining in seconds:26.631053, total directories:2224, total
files:19550
But my test shows tracker related modules take ~150%
14 matches
Mail list logo