Re: [Tracker] Re-index/re-scan on each restart?

2010-09-02 Thread Martyn Russell
On 01/09/10 20:29, Michael Steiner wrote: Hi Martyn, On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:58:52 +0100, Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com said: Thanks for a quick and detailed reply! No problem, MR This is in master, but not in 0.8. I must admit i haven't tried yet master/0.9 as even with a

[Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki'Lya
Hi, I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on each directory recursively, until I made it stop. Is that normal? At 11:30 I was fed up and decided to stop it from indexing $HOME and start index

Re: [Tracker] Re-index/re-scan on each restart?

2010-09-02 Thread Martyn Russell
On 02/09/10 04:41, Michael Steiner wrote: Following additional observations after having enabled increased logging and doing some work towards using 0.9. Assuming that the information below might be too much from the mailing list, in particular with attached logs, i send it only to you. Tell me

Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Martyn Russell
On 02/09/10 10:52, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: Hi, Hi, I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on each directory recursively, until I made it stop. Which version of Tracker are you using? There

Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Martyn Russell
On 02/09/10 10:52, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: Hi, Hi, I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on each directory recursively, until I made it stop. Which version of Tracker are you using? There

Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki'Lya
On 09/02/2010 01:16 PM, Martyn Russell wrote: On 02/09/10 10:52, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: Hi, Hi, I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on each directory recursively, until I made it stop.

Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki'Lya
On 09/02/2010 02:45 PM, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: It is quite possible that my database is corrupted and so tracker thinks it has to reindex everything. I just wiped my databased and started indexing from zero, hopefully, that'll help. That was of great help, now tracker starts much more quickly.

[Tracker] miner-fs: Could not process file (timeout by message bus)

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki'Lya
Hi again :) Sorry to bother you with my problem but it seems I can't get tracker-miner-fs to index my mbox files. tracker-info cannot find anything about the file whereas tracker-miner-fs tells me that the file should be monitored. And when I manually run tracker-extract on that file, it print a

[Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.8.17 released (stable)

2010-09-02 Thread Martyn Russell
What is it? === All-in-one indexer, search tool and metadata database. Where can I find out more? == You can visit the project web site: http://www.tracker-project.org/ Where can I get it? === http://download.gnome.org/sources/tracker/0.8/

[Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.9.19 released (unstable)

2010-09-02 Thread Martyn Russell
What is it? === All-in-one indexer, search tool and metadata database. Where can I find out more? == You can visit the project web site: http://www.tracker-project.org/ Where can I get it? === http://download.gnome.org/sources/tracker/0.9/

Re: [Tracker] tracker 0.9.17 evolution miner

2010-09-02 Thread Matthias Thon
Hello Maryn, i see that you are very busy in different questions (tracker-list) I have installed newer versions of tracker on my ubuntu lucid. But I had no goals with evolution push service. Version 0.9.17 is difficult to install, because libgtkhtml has an older version on lucid. For now i have

Re: [Tracker] tracker 0.9.17 evolution miner

2010-09-02 Thread Martyn Russell
On 02/09/10 16:41, Matthias Thon wrote: Hello Maryn, Hi, i see that you are very busy in different questions (tracker-list) I have installed newer versions of tracker on my ubuntu lucid. But I had no goals with evolution push service. Version 0.9.17 is difficult to install, because

Re: [Tracker] Re-index/re-scan on each restart?

2010-09-02 Thread Michael Steiner
Martyn, On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:26:44 +0100, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com said: MR I see. We do 2 things here. We store the file and its mtime in the MR database. We also use inotify to monitor changes during the day to day MR running of the computer. When the miner-fs starts, it

Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Chen, Zhenqiang
For me, an initial index takes: Finished mining in seconds:303.820123, total directories:2224, total files:19550 For crawling subsequent times takes: Finished mining in seconds:26.631053, total directories:2224, total files:19550 But my test shows tracker related modules take ~150%