On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 20:54 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
[Cut]
With the new miner-fs-refactor-multi-insert branch, we are merging
SPARQL updates in a single dbus connection; but still those updates are
then SQL-inserted one by one in the SQLite database (IIRC, pvanhoof?),
Correct
not
Hum, yes, that's the idea actually; I don't understand why you say it's
a regression. CREATED and UPDATED events will get merged in the SPARQL
buffer, and the buffer will be flushed (commited to the store)
if any of
Regression means it takes more time than other branches.
But I
On 10:01 Fri 15 Oct , Martin wrote:
On 19:07 Thu 14 Oct , Martyn Russell wrote:
On 14/10/10 17:11, Martin wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
After trying the alternatives, I found Tracker and I am liking a lot so
far. A
big fat thank you to all developers on this list.
You're most
Hum, yes, that's the idea actually; I don't understand why you say it's
a regression. CREATED and UPDATED events will get merged in the SPARQL
buffer, and the buffer will be flushed (commited to the store)
if any of
Regression means it takes more time than other branches.