Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:12 +, Martyn Russell wrote: On 18/03/11 09:12, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: Hi, Hi, I bumped everything to debug level and now I see in this about Evolution in the logfiles (grep olution *) : Philip, this looks like we need to update our evo plugin? Any

Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Martyn Russell
On 18/03/11 10:26, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:12 +, Martyn Russell wrote: On 18/03/11 09:12, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: Hi, Hi, I bumped everything to debug level and now I see in this about Evolution in the logfiles (grep olution *) : Philip, this looks like we

Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:34 +, Martyn Russell wrote: On 18/03/11 10:26, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:12 +, Martyn Russell wrote: On 18/03/11 09:12, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: Hi, Hi, I bumped everything to debug level and now I see in this about Evolution

Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Martyn Russell
On 18/03/11 10:43, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:34 +, Martyn Russell wrote: Tbh I think it should be taken out by emergency, forcefully. Perhaps by keeping the symbol but letting it do g_critical() and add #warning or maybe even #error in case if -DDISABLE_DEPRECATED

Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 11:01 +, Martyn Russell wrote: On 18/03/11 10:43, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:34 +, Martyn Russell wrote: Tbh I think it should be taken out by emergency, forcefully. Perhaps by keeping the symbol but letting it do g_critical() and add

Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Joost Kraaijeveld
Hi, Do any of you think that it would be possible to backport those changes to 0.10.x? The reason for this is that, as far as I can see, the project's tarball is not Debianised which means that I cannot install it using Debian package management as I cannot compile it it into a deb package. And I

Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Michael Biebl
2011/3/18 Philip Van Hoof phi...@codeminded.be: On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 11:01 +, Martyn Russell wrote: On 18/03/11 10:43, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:34 +, Martyn Russell wrote: Tbh I think it should be taken out by emergency, forcefully. Perhaps by keeping the

Re: [Tracker] Debian Tracker 0.10.0/Evolution 2.32: not mining

2011-03-18 Thread Michael Biebl
2011/3/18 Joost Kraaijeveld j.kraaijev...@askesis.nl: Hi, Do any of you think that it would be possible to backport those changes to 0.10.x? The reason for this is that, as far as I can see, the project's tarball is not Debianised which means that I cannot install it using Debian package

Re: [Tracker] ABI vs API

2011-03-18 Thread Michael Biebl
2011/3/18 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com: On 17/03/11 16:16, Michael Biebl wrote: libtracker-miner: tracker_network_provider_dummy_get_type tracker_password_provider_gnome_get_type There is a bug about this already which I believe Adrien is looking into.  

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.10.4 released (stable)

2011-03-18 Thread Michael Biebl
2011/3/18 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com: On 17/03/11 16:00, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi, Hi, looks like there was an ABI/API break in libtracker-sparql without a soname bump. The following symbols were removed:  tracker_backend_status_wait_async  tracker_backend_status_wait_finish  

Re: [Tracker] ABI vs API

2011-03-18 Thread Martyn Russell
On 18/03/11 10:26, Martyn Russell wrote: On 17/03/11 16:16, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi tracker team! I did a quick analysis of the symbols exported by the libraries that are *not* part of the public API. This is for tracker 0.10.3 Thanks for coming up with this Michael, libtracker-sparql:

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.10.4 released (stable)

2011-03-18 Thread Martyn Russell
On 18/03/11 13:32, Michael Biebl wrote: 2011/3/18 Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com: On 17/03/11 16:00, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi, Hi, looks like there was an ABI/API break in libtracker-sparql without a soname bump. The following symbols were removed: tracker_backend_status_wait_async

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.10.4 released (stable)

2011-03-18 Thread Michael Biebl
2011/3/18 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com: On 18/03/11 13:32, Michael Biebl wrote: So: - while we *strictly* broke ABI, we don't consider it a break. - while we *strictly* broke API, it was never meant to be used publicly. Let's put it differently: It's still an API and ABI break, but

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.10.4 released (stable)

2011-03-18 Thread Thomas Novin
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 15:35 +, Martyn Russell wrote: Where can I get it? === http://download.gnome.org/sources/tracker/0.10/ Found a PPA with tracker 0.10 for Ubuntu. https://launchpad.net/~matthaeus123/+archive/ppa/ Is this the best bet right now if I want to try it

[Tracker] [PATCH] extractor-jpeg: fix original resolution conversion

2011-03-18 Thread lionel . g . landwerlin
From: Lionel Landwerlin lionel.g.landwer...@linux.intel.com According to the specification (http://www.exif.org/Exif2-2.PDF), the resolution unit is described as : 2 = inches unit 3 = centimer unit other = reserved Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin lionel.g.landwer...@linux.intel.com

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.10.4 released (stable)

2011-03-18 Thread John Stowers
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 20:48 +0100, Thomas Novin wrote: On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 15:35 +, Martyn Russell wrote: Where can I get it? === http://download.gnome.org/sources/tracker/0.10/ Found a PPA with tracker 0.10 for Ubuntu.