-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/2014 20:43, Ivan Frade wrote:
[cut mine]
> Some thoughts about the ontology:
>
> 1) KDE is not using nepomuk anymore:
> https://community.kde.org/Baloo#Baloo.2C_Nepomuk.2C_KDE_Platform_4_and_KF5
Damned.
>
That's because we screwed up! I
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Philip Van Hoof
wrote:
>
> On 17/09/2014 17:05, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
> >> Nepomuk separate: Sharing the ontology with KDE desktop, without
> >> GNOME's politics interfering of trying to dominate needlessly
> >> the processes (which, whether GNOME people li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/2014 18:57, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>> Nepomuk separate: Sharing the ontology with KDE desktop, without
>> GNOME's politics interfering of trying to dominate needlessly
>> the pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/2014 17:05, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
>> o. libtracker-sparql and tracker-store get merged together.
>> Perhaps we rename libtracker-sparql, perhaps not, perhaps it
>> doesn't matter.
>>
>> o. Instances of tracker-store become managed by
>> li
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Nepomuk separate: Sharing the ontology with KDE desktop, without
> GNOME's politics interfering of trying to dominate needlessly the
> processes (which, whether GNOME people like this or not, would imply
> that KDE simply woul
On 17/09/14 13:16, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So on IRC ssam2 and martyn were discussing this and then asking me if
what they concluded was something I agreed with. So one more time :-)
My idea is this:
The SPARQL Endpoint
- ---
o. lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So on IRC ssam2 and martyn were discussing this and then asking me if
what they concluded was something I agreed with. So one more time :-)
My idea is this:
The SPARQL Endpoint
- ---
o. libtracker-sparql and tracker-store get merged
