Re: [Tracker] Fwd: tracker 1.11.2

On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 15:52 +, Sam Thursfield wrote: > > - Double checking ontology migration code, ensure it can handle weird > > ontology changes more or less elegantly. > > sounds good, but is this actually possible? I thought we found that it > was too hard to really do this well, and

Re: [Tracker] Fwd: tracker 1.11.2

On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 16:36 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: [cut] > I however think going from "odd minor number is unstable" to semver > versioning with minor!=0 is going to be confusing... Yes, changing it in the middle of a major release number is perhaps not the brightest idea. True. > I

Re: [Tracker] Fwd: tracker 1.11.2

Hi! On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Although following its own version numbers, Tracker has been following > lately the gnome schedule. I came to think lately (most nominally, > when rolling this last bunch of tarballs), that the gnome schedule is >

Re: [Tracker] Fwd: tracker 1.11.2

Hi Philip!, On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 00:44 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > > Hello Carlos, > > NO criticism on the content of the releases and the technical > improvements, nor on the communication on the security bug