[Tracker] Indexing mbox files

2010-08-18 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
mail -> nie:isStoredAs -> nmo:MailboxDataObject -> nie:isPartOf -> nmo:Mailbox It seems rather complex to me and I wanted to know if there was a simpler way to doing things. Thanks, Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTal

Re: [Tracker] Indexing mbox files

2010-08-22 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 2010-08-18 18:16, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: > So, if I understood everything well, I should have something like: > > > nmo:Mailbox -> nie:hasPart -> nmo:MailboxDataObject -> nie:interpretedAs > -> nmo:Email > > and of course > > nmo:Emai

[Tracker] Testing extractors

2010-08-24 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
-extract prints those commands but don't execute them. Is there a way to have them executed (beside copy and pasting in the tracker-sparql command line, I have tons of data in those commands). Thanks, Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk:

Re: [Tracker] Testing extractors

2010-08-24 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
imenting, I ended up reconstructing the whole index. Now, it seems to work but the fs extractor is still running. Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr> GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B │ Fingerprint: 1

Re: [Tracker] Indexing mbox files

2010-08-24 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
ch a desktop, than you guys to make this possible! Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr> GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B │ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 9A7D 2E2B __

[Tracker] some files not indexed

2010-08-25 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
d the kernel limit for inotify. Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr> GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B │ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 9A7D 2E2B

Re: [Tracker] some files not indexed

2010-08-25 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 2010-08-25 10:13, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: > Yesterday, I restarted Tracker, it replayed the journal and the > filesystem miner took a long time to index everything again (it seems). > I don't understand why it missed some files. I don't have anything in > the tracker-

[Tracker] sparql: Could not run update, constraint failed (database corruption?)

2010-08-25 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
rks for a normal e-mail address) Can I do something to fix my database? I also think that tracker should prevent inserting bogus objects like that. Thanks. Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya

Re: [Tracker] sparql: Could not run update, constraint failed (database corruption?)

2010-08-25 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
gy tables: DELETE FROM "nco:EmailAddress" WHERE ID NOT IN (SELECT ID FROM Resource); Can someone confirm this ? Anyway, it worked for my email addresses. Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <

Re: [Tracker] Indexing mbox files

2010-09-01 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 2010-08-23 10:08, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 18:36 +0200, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: >> On 2010-08-18 18:16, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: >> Additionally, how do I generate the URI for the different objects? > > As described here: > > http:/

[Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
a checkout of the tracker git repository, and perhaps two other git repositories (libtinymail and camel-lite which was part of evolution-data-server) Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr>

Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 09/02/2010 01:16 PM, Martyn Russell wrote: > On 02/09/10 10:52, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi, > >> I decided I wanted to monitor recursively my whole $HOME directory, and >> it takes more than two hours for tracker-miner-fs to place monitors on >

Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 09/02/2010 02:45 PM, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: > It is quite possible that my database is corrupted and so tracker thinks > it has to reindex everything. > I just wiped my databased and started indexing from zero, hopefully, > that'll help. That was of great help, now tr

[Tracker] miner-fs: Could not process file (timeout by message bus)

2010-09-02 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
d the answer. Is there something I should look out for? When that works, I'm not sure that my SPARQL queries are valid (they don't conflict with existing data and ontologies), but I'd like to get to that point so I can test. Thanks, Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mi

Re: [Tracker] Re-index/re-scan on each restart?

2010-09-03 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
fo? Well, in fact tracker-extract exits after 30 seconds if inactivity. It restarts when needed. And when a tracker program starts, it removes the previous log file. Perhaps there should be an option to archive the old log files instead of deleting them. Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭

[Tracker] DBus calls _exit() !!!??? [WAS: miner-fs: Could not process file (timeout by message bus)]

2010-09-03 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 09/02/2010 04:35 PM, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: > Hi again :) > > > Sorry to bother you with my problem but it seems I can't get > tracker-miner-fs to index my mbox files. tracker-info cannot find > anything about the file whereas tracker-miner-fs tells me that the fil

Re: [Tracker] DBus calls _exit() !!!??? [WAS: miner-fs: Could not process file (timeout by message bus)]

2010-09-03 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
onsole (assertion failed, invalid UTF8 string). Thanks a lot, I'm working on that now. Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr> GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B │ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4

[Tracker] RDF graphs and full text search

2010-09-03 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
word "Lucene" that is included in a message body (nmo:plainTextMessageContent), the following query don't return any results: SELECT ?x WHERE { ?x a nmo:Email ; fts:match "Lucene" . } Thanks, Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Ja

Re: [Tracker] RDF graphs and full text search

2010-09-03 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
ot;) } Results: 1 file:///home/mildred/Documents/Work/.../file.mbox#4, Do I understand how is supposed to work fts:match correctly? Thanks, Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr> GPG ID

[Tracker] Ontology problem in NMO (nmo:plainTextMessageContent) for Full Text Search

2010-09-06 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi, Looking at Full Text Search, I found that only a limited number of properties were indexed: http://library.gnome.org/devel/ontology/unstable/fts-properties.html The property I want indexed is nmo:plainTextMessageContent, but it doesn't seem to be (see my previous messages). I found that it s

Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.8.17 released (stable)

2010-09-15 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
or totem: tracker_spawn (argv, 10, &totem, NULL, NULL) Am I missing something or is there an extra argument? Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya ╭─ mildred593@online.fr ── │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr> GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B │ Fingerprint:

[Tracker] Fwd: tracker-extract and log file

2011-05-31 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
starts and overwrite the tracker-extract.log file containing precious information about the error is it possible to have a configuration option for all tracker executables that would append to the existing log file instead of overwriting it? Thanks, Mildred -- Mildred Ki'Lya http://mildr

[Tracker] SPARQL: Drop Graph deprecated

2011-05-31 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi again, I created an indexer for tracker 0.8 and now with tracker 0.10, it doesn't work anymore: Use of DROP GRAPH is deprecated I was never clear on what exactly were the sparql requests to add new objects to the database: At first, I just used the simple form: INSERT { a nmo:Email . a nm

Re: [Tracker] Fwd: tracker-extract and log file

2011-05-31 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 31 May 2011 16:53, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > There is no such option, but may be useful in the case of > tracker-extract. > > Anyway, for debugging errors on specific files with tracker-extract you > can always manually call it like: >   $> /usr/libexec/tracker-extract -f /path/to/file/with

[Tracker] SPARQL: recursive search

2011-06-01 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi, Is there a way in Tracker to workaround this limitation: http://www.thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sparql-faq#transitiv8 ? I would like to be able to query files that are under some directory (directly or indirectly). Is this possible in Tracker? Thanks, -- Mildred Ki'Lya http://mildr

Re: [Tracker] SPARQL: recursive search

2011-06-01 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
> >> Is there a way in Tracker to workaround this limitation: >> http://www.thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sparql-faq#transitiv8 ? >> >> I would like to be able to query files that are under some directory >> (directly or indirectly). Is this possible in Tracker? > > Perhaps this is what you're looking for

[Tracker] Full Text Search and find word at offset fts:offsets

2011-07-07 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi, There is the special function fts:offsets that return the offsets where the query was found in a text property. I was wondering, how can I later on take this offset and select an extract to display where the text is found? I first thought that the offset was a character offset and tried to sp

[Tracker] tracker 0.10: some files aren't indexed

2011-10-13 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi, I am using tracker on a huge directory, and some of the files aren't indexed (approximately 35%). More precisely, tracker-info returns basic metadata about the file (file name and such) but nothing about the content of the file itself. I have a special exporter plugin that should fill in some

Re: [Tracker] tracker 0.10: could not process , creating minimal info [WAS: some files aren't indexed]

2011-10-14 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 13 October 2011 18:05, Mildred Ki'Lya wrote: > Hi, > > I am using tracker on a huge directory, and some of the files aren't > indexed (approximately 35%). More precisely, tracker-info returns basic > metadata about the file (file name and such) but nothing about

Re: [Tracker] tracker 0.10: could not process , creating minimal info [WAS: some files aren't indexed]

2011-10-14 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 14 October 2011 10:55, Ivan Frade wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Mildred Ki'Lya > wrote: > > On 13 October 2011 18:05, Mildred Ki'Lya < > mildred593+ml.trac...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >&

Re: [Tracker] tracker 0.10: could not process , creating minimal info [WAS: some files aren't indexed]

2011-10-14 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
On 14 October 2011 10:55, Ivan Frade wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Mildred Ki'Lya > > > Do you have an idea how I could get a list of those files which couldn't > be > > harvested but only had minimal info created for them? Currently, I'

[Tracker] tracker-store consume 100% of CPU

2011-12-07 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi, I am running tracker on a server with many files to index, and I get the tracker-store daemon running at 100% CPU, the machine load is 1.00. I couldn't find why sometimes the search wouldn't work, so I end up having the output of top on the system log every hour. And I found out why. This ser

Re: [Tracker] tracker-store consume 100% of CPU

2011-12-07 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
> > What's interesting is that on my laptop, running Fedora 16 with the latest > tracker from 0.12 branch (0.12.7 currently), I also sometimes found > tracker-store consuming too much CPU, and manually either killed the > process or terminated it using tracker-control. > By the way, tracker-store

[Tracker] tracker-store: PRAGMA integrity_check(1) takes too long

2012-02-08 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi, tracker-store takes too long to complete the PRAGMA integrity_check(1) at startup. This causes tracker-control to timeout on startup and following status queries. Perhaps it could be imagined to have this run in background so tracker-store could still answers basic status queries. If tracker-s

[Tracker] tracker 0.10.37: Vala binding for tracker-client uses deprecated C functions

2012-02-09 Thread Mildred Ki7;Lya
Hi, I'm still using tracker 0.10.x, perhaps I shouldn't; But I still have a miner-fs plugin developped when at the 0.8 times that i need. Basically, i'm running a very simple query that takes about 1 second to complete when I use the command-line tracker-sparql, but when I use the tracker-client