Pushed
Thanks!
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:48 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:31 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > I'd be fine with renaming -v to -V to avoid collision with verbosity.
> > Perhaps look at the tracker-store and tracker-miner-fs tools whether
> > they us
On 19/11/09 20:48, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:31 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
I'd be fine with renaming -v to -V to avoid collision with verbosity.
Perhaps look at the tracker-store and tracker-miner-fs tools whether
they use -v for verbosity, and if so perhaps indeed
On 19/11/09 17:27, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:09 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hey Martyn,
Hej :)
I'll await the conclusions of this discussion between you and Juan
before making any changes to Juan's patches.
I don't mind either using -V or -v. So if Martyn thi
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:31 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I'd be fine with renaming -v to -V to avoid collision with verbosity.
> Perhaps look at the tracker-store and tracker-miner-fs tools whether
> they use -v for verbosity, and if so perhaps indeed better rename to -V.
>
Attached are the pa
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:27 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:09 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hey Juan,
> >
> > I'll await the conclusions of this discussion between you and Juan
> > before making any changes to Juan's patches.
> >
>
> I don't mind either using -V
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:09 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hey Martyn,
>
> I'll await the conclusions of this discussion between you and Juan
> before making any changes to Juan's patches.
>
I don't mind either using -V or -v. So if Martyn thinks it's better to
use "-V", I'll send you a new pat
Hey Martyn,
I'll await the conclusions of this discussion between you and Juan
before making any changes to Juan's patches.
If you guys reached a consensus, feel free to send me a corrections-
patch, Juan (of course).
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:59 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Thu, 2009
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:27 +0800, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Philip, can you please change the patches to not use -v. It is not a
> good option to use. It is typically used for verbosity. Please use -V
> instead.
Really, there isn't an agree about -v or -V to show version. A lot of
pr
On 18/11/09 17:20, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Thanks a lot Juan!
These patches are all git-am'ed and pushed into master.
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:08 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
These set of patches add the typical "--version" option to command-line tools.
In some way, these patches helps
Thanks a lot Juan!
These patches are all git-am'ed and pushed into master.
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:08 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> These set of patches add the typical "--version" option to command-line tools.
>
> In some way, these patches helps to solve comment #2 in bug GB#601799.
>
These set of patches add the typical "--version" option to command-line tools.
In some way, these patches helps to solve comment #2 in bug GB#601799.
---
Juan A. Suarez Romero (10):
tracker-status: add "--version" option
tracker-stats: add "--version" option
tracker-tag: add "--version" o
11 matches
Mail list logo
