2010/3/29 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
On 28/03/10 15:29, Michael Biebl wrote:
2010/3/25 Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com:
This release is considered a Release Candidate for 0.8. Assuming no
major regressions are found with it, the next release is likely to
be 0.8.0.
I checked the
On 30/03/10 08:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
2010/3/29 Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com:
I have reverted my change here, I did some checking too, the original regex
should cover everything we need here.
This should be fixed.
Not quite.
I still find the following symbols for which no headers are
Hi all,
Currently the relation extractor - mime type is hardcoded _inside_ the
extractor module code. It could be very convenient to have it in an external
file (one per extractor, one for all extractors... not sure which one is the
best option).
An example of why is it a problem right now: our
On 28/03/10 15:44, Michael Biebl wrote:
2010/3/25 Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com:
The result is attached.
Quite a few files seem to miss an appropriate header, a few have
outdated an outdated FSF address,
and for some it's not clear to me why LGPL is used over GPL.
I thought only the libs
On 29/03/10 12:58, Ivan Frade wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
Currently the relation extractor - mime type is hardcoded _inside_ the
extractor module code. It could be very convenient to have it in an
external file (one per extractor, one for all extractors... not sure
which one is the best option).
An
On 28/03/10 15:29, Michael Biebl wrote:
2010/3/25 Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com:
This release is considered a Release Candidate for 0.8. Assuming no
major regressions are found with it, the next release is likely to
be 0.8.0.
I checked the current state of git master again, and
2010/3/25 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
This release is considered a Release Candidate for 0.8. Assuming no
major regressions are found with it, the next release is likely to
be 0.8.0.
I checked the current state of git master again, and compared which
symbols are exported and what is
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:29:20 +0200, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/3/25 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
This release is considered a Release Candidate for 0.8. Assuming no
major regressions are found with it, the next release is likely to
be 0.8.0.
I checked the current
2010/3/25 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
This release is considered a Release Candidate for 0.8. Assuming no
major regressions are found with it, the next release is likely to
be 0.8.0.
Me again.
I also did an automated scan for missing/outdated licensing/copyright
information on
2010/3/28 Adrien Bustany mad...@mymadcat.com:
Thanks for the report! I have a few symbols that belong to my code, I'll
fix that. BTW, couldn't we have a C macro to export symbols, something
along the lines of
TRACKER_EXPORT void
tracker_my_function_that_should_be_public (void)
rather than
On 28/03/10 14:42, Adrien Bustany wrote:
TRACKER_EXPORT void
tracker_my_function_that_should_be_public (void)
rather than playing with regexps in the Makefile ? I've no idea of how it
would be done though. I know KDE does it, so it should be doable.
The regex is good enough, I removed the
tracker 0.7.28 is now available for download from:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/tracker/0.8/
83278bc13388ffb9ed49906ce099a942 tracker-0.7.28.tar.gz
What is it?
===
All-in-one indexer, search tool and metadata database.
Where can I find out more?
==
You can
12 matches
Mail list logo
