On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 23:07, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 03/06/10 18:33, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 17:06, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/06/10 14:31, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:43, Florent Thévenet
wrote:
>
>
On 03/06/10 18:33, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 17:06, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 03/06/10 14:31, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:43, Florent Thévenetwrote:
Hi,
Even with 0.8 series tracker-search gives strange results, for example
http://ubunt
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 17:06, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 03/06/10 14:31, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:43, Florent Thévenet wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Even with 0.8 series tracker-search gives strange results, for example
>>> http://ubuntuone.com/p/3op/
>>> http://ubunt
On 03/06/10 14:31, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:43, Florent Thévenet wrote:
Hi,
Even with 0.8 series tracker-search gives strange results, for example
http://ubuntuone.com/p/3op/
http://ubuntuone.com/p/3oq/
Strange isn't it ?
Actually when you enter "search" it's qui
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 13:31, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:43, Florent Thévenet wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Even with 0.8 series tracker-search gives strange results, for example
>> http://ubuntuone.com/p/3op/
>> http://ubuntuone.com/p/3oq/
>> Strange isn't it ?
>
> Actually when
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:43, Florent Thévenet wrote:
> Hi,
> Even with 0.8 series tracker-search gives strange results, for example
> http://ubuntuone.com/p/3op/
> http://ubuntuone.com/p/3oq/
> Strange isn't it ?
Actually when you enter "search" it's quietly sent as "search*". If
you really wan
Hi,
Even with 0.8 series tracker-search gives strange results, for example
http://ubuntuone.com/p/3op/
http://ubuntuone.com/p/3oq/
Strange isn't it ?
Cheers
--
Florent Thévenet
___
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
Hi Nikolaus,
> Please consider http://www.rath.org/search1.jpg and
> http://www.rath.org/search2.jpg.
>
> Why isn't the second search producing "testfile.txt" as a result?
> According to the first search, "testfile.txt" is in the index and
> contains the search string
Adrien Bustany writes:
Please consider http://www.rath.org/search1.jpg and
http://www.rath.org/search2.jpg.
Why isn't the second search producing "testfile.txt" as a result?
According to the first search, "testfile.txt" is in the index and
contains the search string.
Adrien Bustany writes:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010 16:46:09 -0400, Nikolaus Rath
>
> wrote:
>> On 05/14/2010 03:32 PM, Adrien Bustany wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 13:50:07 -0400, Nikolaus Rath
>>>
>>> wrote:
Hello,
Please consider http://www.rath.org/search1.jpg and
http://www.
On Fri, 14 May 2010 16:46:09 -0400, Nikolaus Rath
wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 03:32 PM, Adrien Bustany wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 13:50:07 -0400, Nikolaus Rath
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please consider http://www.rath.org/search1.jpg and
>>> http://www.rath.org/search2.jpg.
>>>
>>> Why isn't the
On 05/14/2010 03:32 PM, Adrien Bustany wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010 13:50:07 -0400, Nikolaus Rath
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please consider http://www.rath.org/search1.jpg and
>> http://www.rath.org/search2.jpg.
>>
>> Why isn't the second search producing "testfile.txt" as a result?
>> According to
On Fri, 14 May 2010 13:50:07 -0400, Nikolaus Rath
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please consider http://www.rath.org/search1.jpg and
> http://www.rath.org/search2.jpg.
>
> Why isn't the second search producing "testfile.txt" as a result?
> According to the first search, "testfile.txt" is in the index and
>
Hello,
Please consider http://www.rath.org/search1.jpg and
http://www.rath.org/search2.jpg.
Why isn't the second search producing "testfile.txt" as a result?
According to the first search, "testfile.txt" is in the index and
contains the search string.
Confused,
-Nikolaus
--
»Time flies l
14 matches
Mail list logo
