Re: [Tracker] Moving crawling to the indexer

2008-11-11 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 16:45 +, Martyn Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > > PREFACE: > > > So I have been looking at one of the remaining issues we have before > releasing the next version of Tracker upstream. As Jamie outlined it it is: > > 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs

Re: [Tracker] Moving crawling to the indexer

2008-11-11 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hi! The main problem I see with keeping the status in a single place is that there are for example reasons why the indexer would want to be paused a while, but not have the daemon (nor apps on top of it) notified of it, for example when it's flushing data to disk, and it's feasible that we end up

Re: [Tracker] Moving crawling to the indexer

2008-11-11 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 16:45 +, Martyn Russell wrote: > My idea was that the daemon, which is _ALWAYS_ running, should hold all > state information and the indexer shouldn't since it is temporary, not > always running. By state information, I mean: > > - Are we in READONLY mode > - Are we runni

Re: [Tracker] Moving crawling to the indexer

2008-11-11 Thread Martyn Russell
Martyn Russell wrote: > COMMENTS: > = > > What are people's thoughts about how we maintain state here? > Just so you know, this work is scheduled to be done around January time. For now, the Maemo work is focusing on bug fixes. -- Regards, Martyn ___

[Tracker] Moving crawling to the indexer

2008-11-10 Thread Martyn Russell
Hi all, PREFACE: So I have been looking at one of the remaining issues we have before releasing the next version of Tracker upstream. As Jamie outlined it it is: 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer (and pass directories to watch back to the daemo