Hi all,
I'm looking for an alternative to use soprano as RDF storage for a
work that i'm going to do, and i've read that tracker are going to to
what i need.
Reading the features page on the site [
http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/features.html ] object store seem
what i need, and reading this pa
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:20 +0200, Michele Tameni wrote:
Hi Michele,
> I'm looking for an alternative to use soprano as RDF storage for a
> work that i'm going to do, and i've read that tracker are going to to
> what i need.
> Reading the features page on the site [
> http://projects.gnome.org/tr
hi
On 5/16/09, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:20 +0200, Michele Tameni wrote:
>
> Hi Michele,
>
>> I'm looking for an alternative to use soprano as RDF storage for a
>> work that i'm going to do, and i've read that tracker are going to to
>> what i need.
Tracker is not a gene
Sorry for the delay, reply inline :)
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>
> This AppDevelopersManual is outdated.
>
Dho!
> Most important things that you need to know about for Tracker's first
> next release series (the 0.7 release series) is the Nepomuk ontology and
> SPA
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ivan Frade wrote:
>
> It is difficult to forget RDF using a rdf storage :). But we use the
> turtle format for the triplets to make it less painful. Turtle is much
> nicer and easier to handle/read/write than rdf/xml.
>>
what i mean with "forget rdf" is that wou
