[Tracker] Referential Integrity (Was: Re: Fwd: tracker 1.11.2)

2016-12-21 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hey Philip :), On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 17:07 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > > [cut] > >> >> - Getting as close to supporting the full sparql 1.1 spec as possible >> >> in libtracker-data: >> >> * property paths: last weekend got halfway w

Re: [Tracker] Referential Integrity (Was: Re: Fwd: tracker 1.11.2)

2016-12-21 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:29 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: Hello Carlos, > > Personally think some sort of reference counting will be needed for > > anonymous nodes references by different graphs.. > > It's not as much reference counting as it is a "weak pointer" what we > want here, no? i.e. we

Re: [Tracker] Referential Integrity (Was: Re: Fwd: tracker 1.11.2)

2016-12-21 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hey :), On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:29 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > >> I need testing with further nodes though, as I'd expect things to get >> linearly worse with data, both in size with the additional indexes and >> performance w/o ind