On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:20 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> If doing this BODYSTRUCTURE part (which isn't as heavy as the commented
> out code that I mentioned earlier at all) you'd have 95% of all the
> things you want (with exception of the actual text/plain content of the
> E-mails).
Note abou
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:15 -0800, George Farris wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:13 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > On 20/01/11 16:20, George Farris wrote:
Hi George,
> > > Is there some reason tracker is setup to talk to Evolution for indexing
> > > email? Email indexing hasn't really worke
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:13 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 20/01/11 16:20, George Farris wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Is there some reason tracker is setup to talk to Evolution for indexing
> > email? Email indexing hasn't really worked well since the days before
> > Evo used SQLite?
> >
On 20/01/11 16:20, George Farris wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
Is there some reason tracker is setup to talk to Evolution for indexing
email? Email indexing hasn't really worked well since the days before
Evo used SQLite?
I would really love to have my email indexed and not just the subject
but the en
Hi all,
Is there some reason tracker is setup to talk to Evolution for indexing
email? Email indexing hasn't really worked well since the days before
Evo used SQLite?
I would really love to have my email indexed and not just the subject
but the entire thing.
Is there anything that can be done h
