On Fri, 07 Nov 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
> >> before releasing, b
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
>>> before releasing, besides:
>>> * tracker-prefere
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
>> before releasing, besides:
>
>> * tracker-preferences work (hopefully let it use track
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:16 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> One question I have is, do we really need the "enabled" column if it
> only pertains to the Volumes table - can we not just have 1 column and 1
> row in the Volumes table for "enabled" and do some nic
Jamie McCracken wrote:
One question I have is, do we really need the "enabled" column if it
only pertains to the Volumes table - can we not just have 1 column and 1
row in the Volumes table for "enabled" and do some nice SQL to know if
content is enabled based on purely the auxi
> >> One question I have is, do we really need the "enabled" column if it
> >> only pertains to the Volumes table - can we not just have 1 column and 1
> >> row in the Volumes table for "enabled" and do some nice SQL to know if
> >> content is enabled based on purely the auxiliary ID in the Servic
Jamie McCracken wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:07 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> Jamie McCracken wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 12:43 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
> There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
>
> 1) enumerating and crawl
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:07 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 12:43 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> >>> There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
> >>>
> >>> 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to b
Jamie McCracken wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 12:43 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> Jamie McCracken wrote:
>>> There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
>>>
>>> 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer
>>> (and pass directories to watch back to the
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 12:43 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
> >
> > 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer
> > (and pass directories to watch back to the daemon). Daemon can then
Jamie McCracken wrote:
> There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
>
> 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer
> (and pass directories to watch back to the daemon). Daemon can then run
> as nice 0 and normal ionice instead of nice 19 as only cpu/io
Hi,
I was unable to reproduce that memory leak. I did more than 20
queries with TST and trackerd is using the same memory, according with
"top" and the numbers in "/proc/{pid}/statm".
So i closed the bug us obsolete.
Thanks,
Ivan
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
<[EMAI
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
> before releasing, besides:
> * TST searches killing trackerd and tracker-indexer
> * memory leak in tracker-indexer
> * tracker-preferences wo
On jue, 2008-10-09 at 03:20 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/10/9 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008/10/8 Carlos Garnacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Turned out to be a memory corruption, an array was being written past
> >> its limits in tracker_db_create_array_of_services(), I fixed it
>
2008/10/9 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/8 Carlos Garnacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Turned out to be a memory corruption, an array was being written past
>> its limits in tracker_db_create_array_of_services(), I fixed it
>> yesterday night in r2325, so please give it a try :)
>
> Thank
2008/10/8 Carlos Garnacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!,
>
> On mar, 2008-10-07 at 22:50 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
>> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 01:04 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > 2008/10/3 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wo
Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
>> before releasing, besides:
>
>> * tracker-preferences work (hopefully let it use tracker-config)
I forgot to mention, with the last com
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The TrackerConfiguration API is far easier to maintain. Rather than having
>> functions for every single option, its a simple, generic API.
>
> It's interesting that you bring this onl
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The TrackerConfiguration API is far easier to maintain. Rather than having
> functions for every single option, its a simple, generic API.
It's interesting that you bring this only now, months after
tracker-config has
Hi!,
On mar, 2008-10-07 at 22:50 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 01:04 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > 2008/10/3 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
> > > before releasing, besides:
>
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 04:41 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> > While we are talking about configuration, I wanted to add some ideas
> > and requests that were brought to me by Debian users.
> >
> > They are looking for a way to set tracker options
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 01:04 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/10/3 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
> > before releasing, besides:
> > * TST searches killing trackerd and tracker-indexer
>
> FWIW, I can repr
nope - that would require gconf support. Then again waiting for
gtksettings/dconf might be better?
in any event it would be easy to add different compile time backends as
the config is now nicely abstracted
jamie
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 04:41 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/10/8 Saleem Abdulras
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:30 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
> > 2008/10/6 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >>> Other points:
> >>> * config file of tracker-applet is ~/.config/trackertracker-applet.cfg
> >>> * duplicated code in src/libtracker
2008/10/8 Saleem Abdulrasool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
>> >> * tracker-preferences work (hopefully let it use tracker-config)
>> >
>> > What exactly needs to be done for this?
>>
>> The TrackerConfig API needs implementing instead of the
>> TrackerConfigura
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >> * tracker-preferences work (hopefully let it use tracker-config)
> >
> > What exactly needs to be done for this?
>
> The TrackerConfig API needs implementing instead of the
> TrackerConfiguration API.
Sure, I can try to get around to do that in a
Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/10/7 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> 2008/10/6 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Other points:
> * config file of tracker-applet is ~/.config/trackertracker-applet.cfg
> * duplicated code in src/li
2008/10/7 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> 2008/10/6 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
Other points:
* config file of tracker-applet is ~/.config/trackertracker-applet.cfg
* duplicated code in src/libtracker-common/tracker-co
Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
Hi :)
>> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
>> before releasing, besides:
>
>> * tracker-preferences work (hopefully let it use tracker-config)
>
> What exactly needs to be done
Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/10/6 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>>> Other points:
>>> * config file of tracker-applet is ~/.config/trackertracker-applet.cfg
>>> * duplicated code in src/libtracker-common/tracker-config(uration).[ch]
>>> * API/ABI break in libtracker-
Ivan Frade wrote:
> Hi
>
> El lun, 06-10-2008 a las 16:58 +0100, ext Martyn Russell escribió:
>> Jamie McCracken wrote:
>>> There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
>>>
>>> 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer
>>> (and pass directories to watch
Hi
El lun, 06-10-2008 a las 16:58 +0100, ext Martyn Russell escribió:
> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
> >
> > 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer
> > (and pass directories to watch back to the daemon). Da
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
> before releasing, besides:
> * tracker-preferences work (hopefully let it use tracker-config)
What exactly needs to be done for this? I have a stale change sitting aro
2008/10/6 Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Other points:
>> * config file of tracker-applet is ~/.config/trackertracker-applet.cfg
>> * duplicated code in src/libtracker-common/tracker-config(uration).[ch]
>> * API/ABI break in libtracker-gtk
>
> Are you referring to
Jamie McCracken wrote:
> There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
>
> 1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer
> (and pass directories to watch back to the daemon). Daemon can then run
> as nice 0 and normal ionice instead of nice 19 as only cpu/io
Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/10/3 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi,
Hi Michael,
>> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
>> before releasing, besides:
>> * TST searches killing trackerd and tracker-indexer
>
> FWIW, I can reproduce this bug. Imo this is t
Hi Michael,
El sáb, 04-10-2008 a las 02:52 +0200, ext Michael Biebl escribió:
> 2008/10/4 Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
> >
> >
> > 3) Needs to be fully backward compatible with API and config options.
> > Its likely that we wi
2008/10/4 Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
>
>
> 3) Needs to be fully backward compatible with API and config options.
> Its likely that we will have to force a reindex for 0.6.6 as Im not sure
> db will work with old versions. I wou
There are also a load of other issues that need correcting:
1) enumerating and crawling directories needs to be done in the indexer
(and pass directories to watch back to the daemon). Daemon can then run
as nice 0 and normal ionice instead of nice 19 as only cpu/io heavy ops
will be searches and q
2008/10/3 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
> before releasing, besides:
> * TST searches killing trackerd and tracker-indexer
FWIW, I can reproduce this bug. Imo this is the most important
showstopper for me atm.
Hi,
It's been quite a while since 0.6.6 and wonder what's still left
before releasing, besides:
* TST searches killing trackerd and tracker-indexer
* memory leak in tracker-indexer
* tracker-preferences work (hopefully let it use tracker-config)
--
my place on the web:
floss-and-misc.blogspot.co
41 matches
Mail list logo
