>Sounds good. Since we're redesigning this, maybe a more extensible way
>can be preferable?
>
>(just a mockup)
>
>typedef enum tcstatus_ TCStatus;
>enum tcstatus_
>TC_ERROR = -1, /* unrecoverable error */
>TC_OK = 0, /* all fine */
>TC_RETRY, /* generic recoverable error */
>
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:24:10 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Church) wrote:
> >I like to use TC_EXPORT_* macros for return values instead direct integers,
> >but I can happily live with either solution.
> >I'd just like to establish an official line of conduct :)
> Sorry, I didn't realize that
>Very last commits on encode_X264.c reverted my changes in using returning
>values.
>I like to use TC_EXPORT_* macros for return values instead direct integers,
>but I can happily live with either solution.
>
>I'd just like to establish an official line of conduct :)
Sorry, I didn't realize t
Hi,
Very last commits on encode_X264.c reverted my changes in using returning
values.
I like to use TC_EXPORT_* macros for return values instead direct integers,
but I can happily live with either solution.
I'd just like to establish an official line of conduct :)
Best regards
--
Francesco Ro
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:09:18 -0700
Phil Ehrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Francesco Romani wrote:
> >
> > this afternoon/night I've drinked some extra coffee, so I've been capable
> > to revamp 1.0.x branch applying *really* urgent hotfixes.
>
> I appreciate this VERY much Francesco, since toda
