FYI, I'm starting the Mercurial adjustments now, so don't commit anything
new to the exit1.org repository for the moment.
--Andrew Church
achu...@achurch.org
http://achurch.org/
>> - Keep on using hg.exit1.org as the main source repository, but set it up
>> to automatically push changes to berlios.de, and use the HTTP server
>> there for anonymous read access.
>
>This one is a good match.
>My plan (of course susceptible to discussion and adjustements) is to use
>hg.ber
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 23:49 +, Andrew Church wrote:
> Francesco, now that we have a Mercurial repository (thanks Joern!)
Yup, Thanks Joern! :)
> what's your thought on how to manage it? Given the berlios.de site,
> I could see a few ways of doing things:
[...]
> - Keep on using hg.exit1.org
Francesco, now that we have a Mercurial repository (thanks Joern!)
what's your thought on how to manage it? Given the berlios.de site,
I could see a few ways of doing things:
- Keep on using hg.exit1.org as the main source repository, and ask Joern
to set up HTTP for anonymous read access.
- K
Jörn Reder wrote:
> I now will start with the repository migration to Mercurial. As Andrew
> suggested I will do a cvs->svn conversion first, and the convert the
> svn->hg.
>
> So please don't commit any changes to cvs from now on, otherwise commits
> may be missing in the hg repository (as wel
Hiho,
I now will start with the repository migration to Mercurial. As Andrew
suggested I will do a cvs->svn conversion first, and the convert the
svn->hg.
So please don't commit any changes to cvs from now on, otherwise commits
may be missing in the hg repository (as well I'll stop the cvs ser
