Is doing this a bad idea?
<object name="Thingy" table="thingy" sequence="THINGY_KEY_SEQ">
<id name="id" type="numeric" column="key_num"/>
<property name="a" type="string" column="a"/>
....
<onetomany name="AnotherThiny" lazy="true">
<link to="thingies.AnotherThingy" column="another_thingy_id"/>
<collection type="array">
<order property="thingyNumber" order="asc"/>
</collection>
</onetomany>
</object>
<object name="PopulatedThingy" table="thingy"
sequence="THINGY_KEY_SEQ">
<id name="id" type="numeric" column="key_num"/>
<property name="a" type="string" column="a"/>
.....
<onetomany name="AnotherThingy" lazy="false">
<link to="thingies.AnotherThingy" column="another_thingy_id"/>
<collection type="array">
<order property="thingyNumber" order="asc"/>
</collection>
</onetomany>
</object>
So if I want to use lazy loading I use the "Thingy" object, but if I
want to get a fully populated object I use the "PopulatedThingy"
object.
It works, but is it good practice?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
