Re: [translate-pootle] PyLucene 2 porting

2007-04-20 Thread Nicolas François
Hi, On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 05:16:37PM +0400, Rail Aliev wrote: > > Nikolas, can you point me to the latest python-lucene Debian package. I > prepared one but have some problems with pycentral. packages.debian.org > doesn't know about such package. :( I think I found the package that Christian p

Re: [translate-pootle] mod_python

2007-04-20 Thread Dwayne Bailey
Yip I'm afraid it is on hold/abandoned as it will be resolved with the Django port. We did try implement some locking features in the 1.0 but had to take them out as it was eating up things with too many open files. On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:03 -0300, Matt Dorn wrote: > Hi all, > > Pootle does m

Re: [translate-pootle] PyLucene 2 porting

2007-04-20 Thread Rail Aliev
> "FW" == F Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: FW> It was on 25 December last year. I put also put the two files here: FW> http://translate.sourceforge.net/patches/ Thanks a lot. FW> I guess only the lucene one is necessary, but I haven't had time FW> to look at this at all. Please

[translate-pootle] mod_python

2007-04-20 Thread Matt Dorn
Hi all, Pootle does most of what I need it to do, but I can't afford another long-running process on my server. Browsing the mailing list a bit, I see that mod_python won't work due to locking issues, and I'm wondering if mod_python compatibility has been put on hold until the Django version is c

Re: [translate-pootle] PyLucene 2 porting

2007-04-20 Thread F Wolff
On Vr, 2007-04-20 at 13:39 +0400, Rail Aliev wrote: > > "FW" == F Wolff writes: > > [...] > > FW> Nicolas François already sent a patch for it. I still wanted to test > FW> whether it is backwards compatible, but if you tested it and it > FW> doesn work, we should probably just document

Re: [translate-pootle] PyLucene 2 porting

2007-04-20 Thread Rail Aliev
> "FW" == F Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] FW> Nicolas François already sent a patch for it. I still wanted to test FW> whether it is backwards compatible, but if you tested it and it FW> doesn work, we should probably just document it. I think we should FW> definitely migrat

Re: [translate-pootle] PyLucene 2 porting

2007-04-20 Thread F Wolff
On Vr, 2007-04-20 at 11:58 +0400, Rail Aliev wrote: > Hi, > > As you know Pootle needs to use PuLucene to speedup searches, and it is > very important for big projects like OOo. > > How I can understand jtoolkit uses PuLucene 1.9 but this version has > problems with new gcj/g++ (4.x). It's very p

[translate-pootle] PyLucene 2 porting

2007-04-20 Thread Rail Aliev
Hi, As you know Pootle needs to use PuLucene to speedup searches, and it is very important for big projects like OOo. How I can understand jtoolkit uses PuLucene 1.9 but this version has problems with new gcj/g++ (4.x). It's very painful to use gcc 3.4 with new distros. Latest PyLucene seems work