Hi Carlos,
1. Yes. Section 5 rather than Seciton 4 is relevant. The last paragraph of the
Intro will be updated to reflect this.
2. OK. The text will be updated.
Thanks,
Mingui
From: Carlos Pignataro [cpign...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017
Carlos:
Thank you for the quick review.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: rtg-dir [mailto:rtg-dir-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:20 PM
To: rtg-...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; trill@ietf.org
Subject:
Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro
Review result: Has Nits
Hi,
This is a short yet well written document. Looks really good. Just a
couple of small questions/comments:
1. It's not clear exactly what from RFC 7175 is being updated by
Section 4. This is based on the last paragraph of the Intro, yet
