Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-14.txt - Consensus reached

2018-02-19 Thread Joe Touch
e > listening. The document title can change during the IETF LC process. > > Sue > > From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@strayalpha.com] > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 4:40 PM > To: Susan Hares > Cc: trill IETF mailing list; trill-cha...@ietf.org; Alia Atlas

Re: [trill] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-13 (14-Feb to 20-Feb)

2018-02-14 Thread Joe Touch
I’ve already expressed my views on this document. The changes have not addressed the points I have raised. Given its current state, I would appreciate if the authors would remove my name from the list of acknowledgments. I do not want to be associated with its content in any way in its

Re: [trill] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-10

2018-02-02 Thread Joe Touch
sion. > > Sue Hares > Trill co-chair > > -Original Message- > From: trill [mailto:trill-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Touch > Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 10:34 AM > To: Magnus Westerlund > Cc: Donald Eastlake; tsv-...@ietf.org; trill IETF mailing list;

Re: [trill] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-10.txt

2017-05-31 Thread Joe Touch
Hi, all, I'm confused by the TCP encapsulation shown. If you place TRILL in TCP, you cannot ensure that the TRILL packets are aligned with the TCP headers. TCP is a bytestream, not message-oriented. I.e., you need to assume that TRILL packets could be split across TCP segments or multiple TRILL

Re: [trill] Review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08

2017-01-05 Thread Joe Touch
to this, it really should be included in the intro) Joe On 1/5/2017 10:44 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > Hi, Donald, > > > On 1/4/2017 5:43 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote: >> Hi Joe, >> >> Thanks for the comments. >> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Joe Touch &